BULLSHIT!
You can believe whatever pleases you, but your interpretation of Susskind's video is pathologically delusional.
Actually, the above link begins about 8 or so minutes into Dr. Susskind's talk. To begin at the beginning, go to this link:
Quote from stu:
Physicist Leonard Susskind Rejects Intelligent Design
â I don't believe that the universe was designed by an intelligence. I believe the universe was designed the same way the incredible human being was designed. It certainly looks - and before Darwin it looked like some designer must have....what else could possibly account for the complexity of a human being, the human brain and so forth, and we eventually found out what it was. It was random mutation, a bunch of carbon oxygen and other stuff for that mutation to work on, and a little bit of everything evolved. Some things did better than others. Those things are more populous than the things that didn't do well and so it was basically randomness, statistics and the laws of physics that led to our own design.
I think the same is true of the universe. oh incidentally, in the process of designing us, it also designed a hell of a lot of stuff not nearly as intelligent as we are in fact most of the stuff out there is not intelligent. And so it wasn't that there was an upward trend that just naturally led to intelligence, there was just, everything happened. Everything that could happen happened. Some of it's still happening.
That seems to be the way, or at least according to one version of cosmology, and it's by now the most popular version of cosmology, is the universe is exceedingly big, just like the bush or the tree of life, it has many different environments. So many different environments that a very small fraction of them are capable of supporting life and that small fraction of them happens to be the small fraction that 'looks' [Susskindâs emphasis] as if it were intelligently designed. Incidentally it's the only fraction we can exist in which to ask the question. So that's my view of it other people have different views. â
To anyone who watches the vid , listens to or reads what he says objectively, it is perfectly clear and obvious Susskind says and clearly states ....
'I don't believe that the universe was designed by an intelligence......"
he explains..
it 'looks' as if it were intelligently designed... but is isn't. It's "random mutation, a bunch of carbon oxygen and other stuff ...."
In grasping at straws in an over zealous religious intent, you are a delusional wreck jem and you've supplied the very evidence yourself to prove it
Quote from stu:
Physicist Leonard Susskind Rejects Intelligent Design
â I don't believe that the universe was designed by an intelligence. I believe the universe was designed the same way the incredible human being was designed. It certainly looks - and before Darwin it looked like some designer must have....what else could possibly account for the complexity of a human being, the human brain and so forth, and we eventually found out what it was. It was random mutation, a bunch of carbon oxygen and other stuff for that mutation to work on, and a little bit of everything evolved. Some things did better than others. Those things are more populous than the things that didn't do well and so it was basically randomness, statistics and the laws of physics that led to our own design.
I think the same is true of the universe. oh incidentally, in the process of designing us, it also designed a hell of a lot of stuff not nearly as intelligent as we are in fact most of the stuff out there is not intelligent. And so it wasn't that there was an upward trend that just naturally led to intelligence, there was just, everything happened. Everything that could happen happened. Some of it's still happening.
That seems to be the way, or at least according to one version of cosmology, and it's by now the most popular version of cosmology, is the universe is exceedingly big, just like the bush or the tree of life, it has many different environments. So many different environments that a very small fraction of them are capable of supporting life and that small fraction of them happens to be the small fraction that 'looks' [Susskindâs emphasis] as if it were intelligently designed. Incidentally it's the only fraction we can exist in which to ask the question. So that's my view of it other people have different views. â
To anyone who watches the vid , listens to or reads what he says objectively, it is perfectly clear and obvious Susskind says and clearly states ....
'I don't believe that the universe was designed by an intelligence......"
he explains..
it 'looks' as if it were intelligently designed... but is isn't. It's "random mutation, a bunch of carbon oxygen and other stuff ...."
In grasping at straws in an over zealous religious intent, you are a delusional wreck jem and you've supplied the very evidence yourself to prove it
Scientific opinion, which is at the forefront of learning and based on the most considered and thorough assessment of the available evidence, such as it is, carries more credence than the opinions of religious leaders, which are based on hearsay and say-so. I hardly think they carry equal weight for anyone seeking knowledge as compared to, say, comfort.
