Actually, if you read the text, it is "Creationwiki" that disallows argument refutation. That's quite the "messenger" you have there.
Oh, and didn't you claim earlier that cutting and pasting is a copout?
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Atheism is a or is a product of mental illness...
- Thread starter OPTIONAL777
- Start date
Oh, and didn't you claim earlier that cutting and pasting is a copout?
So you are disallowed to refute the argument I posted and evidence to support the argument?
ROTFLMAO...
My argument is that atheism is a or is a product of mental illness.
The copy and past is supporting evidence.
If you can show the evidence itself to be false, please do so.
Ad hominem attack, like you have just done, only strengthens the evidence...any reasonable person can see that.
Now go call Richard Dawkins and ask him what to say next...
Who is your daddy?
Richard Dawkins, or course...
Bwaaahaaahaaaaaa
ROTFLMAO...
My argument is that atheism is a or is a product of mental illness.
The copy and past is supporting evidence.
If you can show the evidence itself to be false, please do so.
Ad hominem attack, like you have just done, only strengthens the evidence...any reasonable person can see that.
Now go call Richard Dawkins and ask him what to say next...
Who is your daddy?
Richard Dawkins, or course...
Bwaaahaaahaaaaaa
Quote from Thunderdog:
Actually, if you read the text, it is "Creationwiki" that disallows argument refutation. That's quite the "messenger" you have there.
Oh, and didn't you claim earlier that cutting and pasting is a copout?
Go ahead and refute the article, or stay in illogical fallacy driven attack the messenger...
It just shows the weakness of your position, and an impotency to actually counter an argument, so please continue...
It just shows the weakness of your position, and an impotency to actually counter an argument, so please continue...
Quote from Thunderdog:
No, I'm just pointing out that your "messenger" is one-sided bullshit by design. Bud meet nip.
I have learned, and occasionally need to remind myself, that it makes little sense to engage people in serious debate if they are either incapable or unwilling to argue with intellectual honesty. Therefore, I'd like to point out that you look particularly rakish and natty in your tinfoil hat. Wearing it at that jaunty, devil-may-care angle makes you look very stylish and dapper. You have arrived.Quote from OPTIONAL777:
Go ahead and refute the article, or stay in illogical fallacy driven attack the messenger...
It just shows the weakness of your position, and an impotency to actually counter an argument, so please continue...
Dodge.
Refute the argument, or not...
You appear to be stuck in not...
Perhaps Richard Dawkins, AKA your daddy, is not accepting your phone calls...
So you and stu can throw tantrums together, on the floor, beating your fists into the floor, crying "I hate my daddy, I hate my daddy, I hate my daddy...."
Too funny!
Dude, you are beaten...
Nut up and make a genuine rational counter argument...
Refute the argument, or not...
You appear to be stuck in not...
Perhaps Richard Dawkins, AKA your daddy, is not accepting your phone calls...
So you and stu can throw tantrums together, on the floor, beating your fists into the floor, crying "I hate my daddy, I hate my daddy, I hate my daddy...."
Too funny!
Dude, you are beaten...
Nut up and make a genuine rational counter argument...
Quote from Thunderdog:
I have learned, and occasionally need to remind myself, that it makes little sense to engage people in serious debate if they are either incapable or unwilling to argue with intellectual honesty. Therefore, I'd like to point out that you look very rakish and natty in your tinfoil hat at that jaunty, devil-may-care angle. You have found your look.
Quote from OPTIONAL777:
...
4. Fairy
Well, if atheists think of a fairy...
Maybe that's who they are...
Well, if OPTIONAL777 thinks about crying and throwing tantrums...Quote from OPTIONAL777:
...throw tantrums...beating your fists into the floor, crying "I hate my daddy, I hate my daddy, I hate my daddy...."
Maybe that's what he does...
Daddy Dawkins won't help you...
LOL!
All of this nonsense, started by you simply because you cannot refute an argument on your own...
Oh well, I have nothing against your faith in atheism, but one would think that atheistic people who are claiming to be rational would at least be able to use reason to defeat an argument...
LOL!
All of this nonsense, started by you simply because you cannot refute an argument on your own...
Oh well, I have nothing against your faith in atheism, but one would think that atheistic people who are claiming to be rational would at least be able to use reason to defeat an argument...
Quote from Thunderdog:
Well, if OPTIONAL777 thinks about crying and throwing tantrums...
Maybe that's what he does...
Now that really is "too Funny"...Quote from OPTIONAL777:
" Giant magic sky Fairy "
God is defined as:
1. Unlimited in size.
So the concept of a "giant" does not apply. Giant is a term applied to indicate a proportional size relative to a standard height. God has no height, as height can be measured. God cannot be measured.
Unlimited size is not "Giant." It is beyond the limited concept of "Giant" or "dwarf" or any other relativistic measurement.
2. magic
Generally refers to supernatural forces. God is fully natural by definition. That God's naturalness is beyond man's natural power does not make God magical. No more than a human's power over an ant makes man magical by comparison.
3. sky
God does not live in the sky by definition. sky is a material existence, a limited existence. sky is not everything, it begins and ends.
God is beyond any concept of limitations, so the sky, a limited thing, could not hold God who is an unlimited thing.
Pretty simple concept for reasonable people to grasp.
A 5 gallon jug can't hold 500 gallons, and the limited sky can't hold an unlimited God.
4. Fairy
Well, if atheists think of a fairy...
Maybe that's who they are...
.... trying to argue atheism is a product of mental illness by fantasizing how an invisible friend would be real if only it could.