Quote from stu:
.....if that were the case, just what do you imagine you are doing?
Repeating the same fallacy of arguing from ignorance does not improve your non-argument any. There is zero proof the universe was created.
For the purposes of this argument then and for the second time of asking , give some rational overriding reason why arguing against the attributes of Creator Zeus may be reasonable, which you say it is , but arguing against "the Creator" would not be . You can't - can you? Thatâll be what's making you sound so angry and abusive â and juvenile.
You are repeating the same fallacy of reasoning again and as predicted, it's not making your non-argument any better. The PBS could equally do a special titled .. ' Every scientist with a job knows that they cannot rule in the existence of a Creator given current science'.
You do understand the difference between world and universeâ¦. do you?
"The world looks finely tuned" implies the world as observed and demonstrated looks like a natural world, naturally "finely tuned" without any necessary implications of infinite universes or any so called Creator. That is, for anyone who can be bothered to actually look at it.
You think people should worship an invisible imaginary friend in the guise of a Giant Sky Daddy, and you're calling those who don't - nuts !!
What sort of mental illness would you have there? Well letâs see, generally speaking it's known as religion.
