atheism and axeman have fallen

GA: The "children" were not innocent in the fact that they would have been murdered by their parents anyway.

Axe: YOU HAVE GOT TO BE KIDDING ME!!!!!!!!

GA: You do not understand. I am not implying that the babies were guilty of sin but rather their parents were.

GA: I know that you do not understand it but that does not change the facts that God judges sin.



From your above words your god also judges the innocent and marks them for death. One sick idol plain and simple.

JB
 
Listen. I did not shy away from nor did I make any excuses to your questions. I faced them head on. Now why don't you do the same. Simply trying to discredit me because you have a problem with a certain passage of Scripture is not how you win an argument. Just because you disagree with a concept does not invalidate that idea. Some aspects of Scripture are harder to except than others that is why I did not want to dive right into the area of Biblical hermeneutics. Instead I wanted to explain why I believe the Bible is divine rather than human in origin.

I also wanted to deal with the original issue I raised earlier which so happens to be the 1st passage of Scripture recorded in Genesis 1:1



Now that I have answered your questions why not try to answer mine? Since we are on the subject of death and killing and murder and apparent contradictions.

Quote from axeman:

AXE:3) God sends wild animals sent to kill infants, but THOU SHALT NOT KILL!!

In case you haven't noticed, the modern body of
scientific knowledge is directly against you.
creationist isn't even taken seriously by the scientific community.

Darwinian Evolution? It is because of the above statement
that atheist kill millions of innocent unborn children everyday in the U.S.A.

"Babies are innocent by any reasonable definition.
I reject any silly story which says you are BORN a sinner/guilty."

"Slaughtering infants would be considered evil by any rational
modern human being."

Then WHY do atheist partake in partial birth abortion?
Why did they lobby Capital Hill to make it legal?

by your above statement if killing of the innocent is wrong then why are most of the everyday killing in the country done by atheist via abortion?

By the way "MOST" of the murderers are atheist physicians performing the killing of the unborn.

It would appear to me that your statements are contradictory and hypocritical.



Quote from axeman:

I understand what you SAID.
Its the meaning which I completely reject as any rational person should.


I don't have a problem with death. I accept it as a part of life.

You have made it painfully clear that no rational man should
attempt to debate you since you clearly do not posses
the required instruments of reason.

Anyone who believes a baby deserves DEATH because
of their parents guilt is NOT a reasonable person.

I will not debate anything further with such a person.
Its pointless.

I rest my case.

peace

axeman
More...

Please do not dodge my questions. If we are going to be honest I think it is the only honorable thing to do. Let's be fair.
More...
 
Quote from Shrewd Dude:

yeaaa!! axeman wins again!!!!!
More...


He has not won anything. He has simply argued that because he disagrees with a Biblical concept that somehow makes it silly and nonsensical. He has NOT proven that my explanation is not true but rather it is tough to swallow.

He has yet to chime in to my questionings.
I'm still waiting.
 
Nonsense. You have failed to resolve the very first contradiction.

YOU SAID: The "children" were not innocent in the fact that they would have been murdered by their parents anyway.

This is NOT a resolution. This is a sick joke of an excuse.
This is why I will not discuss this any futher with you.



peace

axeman


Quote from Guardian Angel:




He has not won anything. He has simply argued that because he disagrees with a Biblical concept that somehow makes it silly and nonsensical. He has NOT proven that my explanation is not true but rather it is tough to swallow.

He has yet to chime in to my questionings.
I'm still waiting.
More...
 
>He has simply argued that because he disagrees
>with a Biblical concept that somehow makes it
>silly and nonsensical

Killing the innocent *is* silly and nonsensical. This world has done way too much of it, much of it under the guise of sick idols such as yours.

JB
 
Quote from axeman:

I understand what you SAID.
Its the meaning which I completely reject as any rational person should.


I don't have a problem with death. I accept it as a part of life.

You have made it painfully clear that no rational man should
attempt to debate you since you clearly do not posses
the required instruments of reason.

As long as you tell yourself that then ofcourse you don't have to answer any of my opposing arguments. You just simply dismiss them without proof.

Anyone who believes a baby deserves DEATH because
of their parents guilt is NOT a reasonable person.

I did not say that the baby deserves DEATH. I said that because of the sins of the parents - their sin caused the death of their children. Born and unborn! and the death of the parents as well.

Again you can set up a strawman and proceed to knock it down when it comes to interpreting Biblical text but what about addressing the hypocrisy within your own belief system- atheism and abortion. There is a direct link between atheism and partial birth abortion.

By your same reasoning how can anyone support partial birth abortion? What is the unborn guilty of?

If we draw this out to its logical conclusion - why does a drunk driver hit an innocent women who happens to be pregnant causing her to lose her unborn child? Does the infant deserve to die? Ofcourse not but the error in judgement caused by the drunk driver causes the demise of the unborn none the less. Does this make it right? perhaps you should bring the child to life because it is not fair- right? Life is not fair and many injustices happen everyday. The innocent die. That is a fact of life.

The fact that God did not intervene does not negate the fact of death. nor does it prevent death from happening.

The reason you dodge my question is because to attempt to answer it would place you in the same position and judgement that you have just pronounced against me.- "Irrational"

I will not debate anything further with such a person.
Its pointless.

what have you debated?
You have repeatedly dodge the murder issue within your own belief system.


I rest MY case.
More...
 
Quote from axeman:

Nonsense. You have failed to resolve the very first contradiction.

YOU SAID: The "children" were not innocent in the fact that they would have been murdered by their parents anyway.

This is NOT a resolution. This is a sick joke of an excuse.
This is why I will not discuss this any futher with you.



peace

axeman
More...

axe you remind me of someone who has only a claw hammer with which to "tool" his way thru life.. and the outcome is wholly predictable.

:p

ps you are sooo easy heh
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top