Perhaps the situation will, someday, turn out badly instead (as the article admits) and you'll be able to "bask" in your victory. : )Quote from Tsing Tao:
The strong "forecast", eh? Yeah, we remember the last time California forecasted a strong showing in their budget, only to fall short because of accounting gimmicks and errors.
Don't you think taking the pensions away from all those greedy public employees is a good thing, though?Quote from John_Wensink:
LOL
Recent estimates show that accounts dedicated to teacher pensions and retiree healthcare for public employees are underfunded by $135 billion.
When the current fiscal year ends next June, the state could have a surplus of $2.2 billion, more than twice the size of earlier projections.
Ignore the 135 billion debt and you "might" have a 2.2 billion surplus.
Only a west coast idiot would have the courage to actually say that in public.
I am sure the analysts have a strong buy on Stockton and Detroit munis.
Quote from John_Wensink:
LOL
Recent estimates show that accounts dedicated to teacher pensions and retiree healthcare for public employees are underfunded by $135 billion.
When the current fiscal year ends next June, the state could have a surplus of $2.2 billion, more than twice the size of earlier projections.
Ignore the 135 billion debt and you "might" have a 2.2 billion surplus.
Only a west coast idiot would have the courage to actually say that in public.
I am sure the analysts have a strong buy on Stockton and Detroit munis.
Quote from Ricter:
Don't you think taking the pensions away from all those greedy public employees is a good thing, though?
Of course none of those pension obligations could be paid anyway if the state's budgetary news wasn't improving, which it is.Quote from Tsing Tao:
Absolutely would be. But it's not going to happen - or did you have another article somewhere detailing how CalPERs is going to allow a pension cut?
If not, then we're back to "California is broke".