At Least One Foreign Hacker Had Clinton E-Mails

[ipatent]

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-cyber-guccifer-idUSKCN0WY5MK

Not sure how this changes things.

If it turns out agents died or major operations were thwarted because of the hacking, I could see insiders being very angry at how the situation has been handled. No public proof of that yet, and because of the security issues there may never be.

In other words, someone may have made the call that it will be handled as a political issue and not criminal, but it can't be a political issue at all if the details are kept from the public.

 

[fhl]

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-cyber-guccifer-idUSKCN0WY5MK

Not sure how this changes things.

If it turns out agents died or major operations were thwarted because of the hacking, I could see insiders being very angry at how the situation has been handled. No public proof of that yet, and because of the security issues there may never be.

In other words, someone may have made the call that it will be handled as a political issue and not criminal, but it can't be a political issue at all if the details are kept from the public.

Yeah, it's just like the bvi shell corps. If it's info that might hurt someone in the cabal, it's going to be kept a secret.

• Corporate Media Gatekeepers Protect Western 1% From Panama Leak (Murray)

Whoever leaked the Mossack Fonseca papers appears motivated by a genuine desire to expose the system that enables the ultra wealthy to hide their massive stashes, often corruptly obtained and all involved in tax avoidance. These Panamanian lawyers hide the wealth of a significant proportion of the 1%, and the massive leak of their documents ought to be a wonderful thing. Unfortunately the leaker has made the dreadful mistake of turning to the western corporate media to publicise the results. In consequence the first major story, published today by the Guardian, is all about Vladimir Putin and a cellist on the fiddle. As it happens I believe the story and have no doubt Putin is bent. But why focus on Russia? Russian wealth is only a tiny minority of the money hidden away with the aid of Mossack Fonseca.

In fact, it soon becomes obvious that the selective reporting is going to stink. The Suddeutsche Zeitung, which received the leak, gives a detailed explanation of the methodology the corporate media used to search the files. The main search they have done is for names associated with breaking UN sanctions regimes. The Guardian reports this too and helpfully lists those countries as Zimbabwe, North Korea, Russia and Syria. The filtering of this Mossack Fonseca information by the corporate media follows a direct western governmental agenda. There is no mention at all of use of Mossack Fonseca by massive western corporations or western billionaires – the main customers. And the Guardian is quick to reassure that “much of the leaked material will remain private.”

What do you expect? The leak is being managed by the grandly but laughably named “International Consortium of Investigative Journalists”, which is funded and organised entirely by the USA’s Center for Public Integrity. Their funders include Ford Foundation, Carnegie Endowment, Rockefeller Family Fund, W K Kellogg Foundation, Open Society Foundation (Soros) among many others. Do not expect a genuine expose of western capitalism. The dirty secrets of western corporations will remain unpublished. Expect hits at Russia, Iran and Syria and some tiny “balancing” western country like Iceland. A superannuated UK peer or two will be sacrificed – someone already with dementia. The corporate media – the Guardian and BBC in the UK – have exclusive access to the database which you and I cannot see.

They are protecting themselves from even seeing western corporations’ sensitive information by only looking at those documents which are brought up by specific searches such as UN sanctions busters. Never forget the Guardian smashed its copies of the Snowden files on the instruction of MI6. What if they did Mossack Fonseca database searches on the owners of all the corporate media and their companies, and all the editors and senior corporate media journalists? What if they did Mossack Fonseca searches on all the most senior people at the BBC?

What if they did Mossack Fonseca searches on every donor to the Center for Public Integrity and their companies? What if they did Mossack Fonseca searches on every listed company in the western stock exchanges, and on every western millionaire they could trace? That would be much more interesting. I know Russia and China are corrupt, you don’t have to tell me that. What if you look at things that we might, here in the west, be able to rise up and do something about? And what if you corporate lapdogs let the people see the actual data?

Read more …

 

[ETcallhome]

Yeah, it's just like the bvi shell corps. If it's info that might hurt someone in the cabal, it's going to be kept a secret.

• Corporate Media Gatekeepers Protect Western 1% From Panama Leak (Murray)

Whoever leaked the Mossack Fonseca papers appears motivated by a genuine desire to expose the system that enables the ultra wealthy to hide their massive stashes, often corruptly obtained and all involved in tax avoidance. These Panamanian lawyers hide the wealth of a significant proportion of the 1%, and the massive leak of their documents ought to be a wonderful thing. Unfortunately the leaker has made the dreadful mistake of turning to the western corporate media to publicise the results. In consequence the first major story, published today by the Guardian, is all about Vladimir Putin and a cellist on the fiddle. As it happens I believe the story and have no doubt Putin is bent. But why focus on Russia? Russian wealth is only a tiny minority of the money hidden away with the aid of Mossack Fonseca.

In fact, it soon becomes obvious that the selective reporting is going to stink. The Suddeutsche Zeitung, which received the leak, gives a detailed explanation of the methodology the corporate media used to search the files. The main search they have done is for names associated with breaking UN sanctions regimes. The Guardian reports this too and helpfully lists those countries as Zimbabwe, North Korea, Russia and Syria. The filtering of this Mossack Fonseca information by the corporate media follows a direct western governmental agenda. There is no mention at all of use of Mossack Fonseca by massive western corporations or western billionaires – the main customers. And the Guardian is quick to reassure that “much of the leaked material will remain private.”

What do you expect? The leak is being managed by the grandly but laughably named “International Consortium of Investigative Journalists”, which is funded and organised entirely by the USA’s Center for Public Integrity. Their funders include Ford Foundation, Carnegie Endowment, Rockefeller Family Fund, W K Kellogg Foundation, Open Society Foundation (Soros) among many others. Do not expect a genuine expose of western capitalism. The dirty secrets of western corporations will remain unpublished. Expect hits at Russia, Iran and Syria and some tiny “balancing” western country like Iceland. A superannuated UK peer or two will be sacrificed – someone already with dementia. The corporate media – the Guardian and BBC in the UK – have exclusive access to the database which you and I cannot see.

They are protecting themselves from even seeing western corporations’ sensitive information by only looking at those documents which are brought up by specific searches such as UN sanctions busters. Never forget the Guardian smashed its copies of the Snowden files on the instruction of MI6. What if they did Mossack Fonseca database searches on the owners of all the corporate media and their companies, and all the editors and senior corporate media journalists? What if they did Mossack Fonseca searches on all the most senior people at the BBC?

What if they did Mossack Fonseca searches on every donor to the Center for Public Integrity and their companies? What if they did Mossack Fonseca searches on every listed company in the western stock exchanges, and on every western millionaire they could trace? That would be much more interesting. I know Russia and China are corrupt, you don’t have to tell me that. What if you look at things that we might, here in the west, be able to rise up and do something about? And what if you corporate lapdogs let the people see the actual data?

Read more …

yes, that is always the question, who decides? The days of hoping the government will get so small that we don't have to worry about it anymore are over. Our only hope now is for EVERYBODY to get involved and fight for their little freedom (or complete control.) Easy for me to say, I am no longer spending every dollar, ounce of strength, and mental energy just to make a small living. Something to think about. Hard to make the change we need now if everybody is working so hard?

 

[Snarkhund]

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-cyber-guccifer-idUSKCN0WY5MK

Not sure how this changes things.

If it turns out agents died or major operations were thwarted because of the hacking, I could see insiders being very angry at how the situation has been handled. No public proof of that yet, and because of the security issues there may never be.

In other words, someone may have made the call that it will be handled as a political issue and not criminal, but it can't be a political issue at all if the details are kept from the public.

If Hillary Clinton is not prosecuted for this massive security breach then there will be a lot of effort to free many who are imprisoned for much less serious violations.

Additionally many people may regard their personal security agreement to be null and void and consider themselves free to seek recognition and compensation for their classified work even if it utilized classified data because "that data was probably overclassified in the first place".

Some people have seen the whole enchilada. They are supposed to monitor the various clearances a scientist acquires over his/her lifetime so that they only see pieces (compartments) but over a long enough career some have worked on every segment and know completely what is under the hood. Some of them could write amazing books that would make Puzzle Palace seem like a children's bedtime story and make Edward Snowden seem like an outsider.

If the law does not apply to Hillary Clinton then it does not apply to them necessarily either. If Hillary gets a pass there is no chance that she will be able to lead or control the intelligence community. She will literally be kept in the dark.

 

[jem]

Here is gucifer in custody.
anything odd about that guys hand in his pocket to you guys?



http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-cyber-guccifer-idUSKCN0WY5MK

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-cyber-guccifer-idUSKCN0WY5MK

Not sure how this changes things.

If it turns out agents died or major operations were thwarted because of the hacking, I could see insiders being very angry at how the situation has been handled. No public proof of that yet, and because of the security issues there may never be.

In other words, someone may have made the call that it will be handled as a political issue and not criminal, but it can't be a political issue at all if the details are kept from the public.