yeah it was new, but the experts were aware that SARs had followed a cluster and Super Spreader model. Plenty of papers on that. Our experts are not morons.
They knew...
The papers are on the net.
Google scientists figure it out. They are not in that field.
We surmised early on the data did not fit the models. .
The universal lockdown of low risk healthy people had never been done before in history. Nothing about this virus called for that.
The pattern this virus followed called for the temporary lock down of clusters and the isolation of those who were high risk.
never should we have had a universal lockdown of low risk healthy people.
There was no science or data to support that..
This was 100 percent bullshit after we saw the hospitals were empty... ( outside of the clusters like NYC).
They knew...
The papers are on the net.
Google scientists figure it out. They are not in that field.
We surmised early on the data did not fit the models. .
The universal lockdown of low risk healthy people had never been done before in history. Nothing about this virus called for that.
The pattern this virus followed called for the temporary lock down of clusters and the isolation of those who were high risk.
never should we have had a universal lockdown of low risk healthy people.
There was no science or data to support that..
This was 100 percent bullshit after we saw the hospitals were empty... ( outside of the clusters like NYC).
It's a new virus, we didn't know shit about it and I am not sure we know much more today. It might wind up acting more like the flu than we think and fall will be a shit show, who knows. Maybe it will turn out to be way less harmful than we thought, but we had to assume the worst case scenario considering the number of lives at stake. Let's not forget a lot of people have died, what would the country do if there were over 30 9/11 scale attacks on our country.
Last edited:
