Quote from downtickboy:
How long has it been since Bright stop locking traders money up? I know they use too do the exact same thing and tie traders money up for a period of time. By the way I would never go to firm that did this. In this business who really needs to deal with this bag of BS with so many other options out there.
We have never locked up people's money for RegT purposes. Years ago when we switched Exchanges there was mention made of doing so, but after we realized it was just an issue of a Firm's solvency, we were able to refund money immediately if needed.
We always choose to "err on the side of caution" so as to be sure that we don't violate any rules. Some firms seem to be a bit less cautious.
I agree, don't fall for any BS, no "sub llc's" with no guarntees to you from the "background" firm.....(usually just a marketing "dodge" .."We are owned by xxxxxxx, so you "know" your money is safe"...just like Enron and all the rest....if they screw you once, shame on them, if they do it again, shame on you")......do your homework, insist on audited balance sheets, and cut off the conversation if they are not supplied!!
We are encouraging our new traders, and College students to increase their depth of understanding by analyzing the stocks they trade, even to the extent of going to Edgar (SEC) and reading 10K's....we do our best to help them interpret the "fine print." You would think that traders would at least insist on the doing the same due diligence with the "partner" they are aligned with.
Don
Don
