CORRECTAMUNDO!
In 2010, the Tea Party got some guys elected on the Republican ticket... only to find out the electees weren't really Tea Party at all. They just lied to get elected, same as do the DemoCraps.
Asian-Americans Have Had the Sharpest Shift Toward Democrats
- Thread starter Covertibility
- Start date
CORRECTAMUNDO!
In 2010, the Tea Party got some guys elected on the Republican ticket... only to find out the electees weren't really Tea Party at all. They just lied to get elected, same as do the DemoCraps.
CORRECTAMUNDO!
In 2010, the Tea Party got some guys elected on the Republican ticket... only to find out the electees weren't really Tea Party at all. They just lied to get elected, same as do the DemoCraps.
It's your tea party that hurts the reps in the presidential election. You get moderate guys like Romney kissing the far right wing tea party's ass and that turns off voters who would otherwise consider voting for him.
Rand is mostly considerate and thoughtful and reasonable in his words now and could bring a lot of swing voters to vote for him, but if he does the idiot march like the presidential candidates did in the last election he will push voters away. Then it'll be hello president Hillary, thanks to the tea party.
I think its the exact opposite... Reagan had an identity and a vision... and got everyone on board.
Romney and Sellout would not even state that lower taxes is the way we improved the economy and raised tax revenue in the past and it will work again.
The public is screaming for someone who will make big useful changes.
The definition of insanity is to run guys like Dole, McCain and Romney (who refused to make conservative stands - although he was super compentent guy) and now Bush or Christie. Big govt, big spending sellouts are now what the country is screaming for.
We need guys with the balls to stand up to big spenders --- like scott walker. or stand up to the establishment like Ted Cruz.
We need a change to a sustainable country and economy.
One that does not sacrifice our kids futures.
One that grows an economy, grows jobs and increases liberty.
Running establishment against Obama who got 4 million fewer votes in 12 vs. 08 was a disaster.
Its time to eliminate personal income tax. Cap the budget... in fact decrease spending a penny a year. Have job attrition. Change the campaign finance system.
And tell the insurance companies they screwed up buying off the democrats and the establishment Rs now they have one month to propose a cheap single payer for basic insurance plus supplemental national health exchange system for better insurance or they risk axed...by new legislation.
Romney and Sellout would not even state that lower taxes is the way we improved the economy and raised tax revenue in the past and it will work again.
The public is screaming for someone who will make big useful changes.
The definition of insanity is to run guys like Dole, McCain and Romney (who refused to make conservative stands - although he was super compentent guy) and now Bush or Christie. Big govt, big spending sellouts are now what the country is screaming for.
We need guys with the balls to stand up to big spenders --- like scott walker. or stand up to the establishment like Ted Cruz.
We need a change to a sustainable country and economy.
One that does not sacrifice our kids futures.
One that grows an economy, grows jobs and increases liberty.
Running establishment against Obama who got 4 million fewer votes in 12 vs. 08 was a disaster.
Its time to eliminate personal income tax. Cap the budget... in fact decrease spending a penny a year. Have job attrition. Change the campaign finance system.
And tell the insurance companies they screwed up buying off the democrats and the establishment Rs now they have one month to propose a cheap single payer for basic insurance plus supplemental national health exchange system for better insurance or they risk axed...by new legislation.
Comedy goldmine.
I can't help but get the impression that you know little to nothing about the Tea Party.
Not unlike most of the Tea Party's detractors.
why on earth would someone want to normalize the data? that was just a bullshit chart someone created to hide a basic truth... truth easily compared. Did revenue go up after tax cuts... yes... in fact the revenue went up 40% after the bush tax cuts... and even the 1% paid more.
there is no purpose to normalizing that type of data other than to hide the truth.
we were not trying to maximize the percent of income people pay in taxes...
would the govt govt rather have 99% of thousand or 10 percent of a billion?
if you pick 99%, and hence normalized charts over increased revenues you are a fascist.
Finally you truth hiding troll ... the polls were skewed and they came back into the predicted zone by election day.
there is no purpose to normalizing that type of data other than to hide the truth.
we were not trying to maximize the percent of income people pay in taxes...
would the govt govt rather have 99% of thousand or 10 percent of a billion?
if you pick 99%, and hence normalized charts over increased revenues you are a fascist.
Finally you truth hiding troll ... the polls were skewed and they came back into the predicted zone by election day.
try answering the question troll.
to focus you troll brain... lets try this again...
would you want... 99% of 100 dollars or 10 percent of a trillion?
to focus you troll brain... lets try this again...
would you want... 99% of 100 dollars or 10 percent of a trillion?