FWIW, i also think Fox deserves to get sued for faulty reporting where there is intent, clearly they wanted to take Obama down, so intentionally faulty reporting about him should get the same result.
There is a reason they canned that asshat Glenn Beck, but the entire CNN network has turned into the Glenn Beck show in reverse.
Anyone who is seen as a "Legitimate" news source should be liable for the shit they report IMO, it would get rid of all the bullshit that makes it impossible to trust anyone anymore.
You need to source just about any political article these days with like ten different sources before you can trust it, is that really the environment you want to live in?
If a news wire does this kind of shit in the stock market they get sued out of existence, how often do you see them get the hard facts wrong? IMO its few and far between, the same kind of standard should apply for other reporting.
That I can't disagree with. Unfortunately, that would require a regulating body, and then which ever government comes in would want to control that regulating body (for latest, look at EPA, FCC, credit protection bureau, etc...). So you end up w/media as in Russia, where they're objective for the most part, but never dare critique the government.
