As Climate Changes, Southern States Will Suffer More Than Others

[jem]

by the way...

why don't you show a list of scientists who state man made co2 causes warming. not a survey... but a list with names of scientists who state they can say that man made co2 causes a significant amount of warming.

not a list of those who say man causes warming... but a list who say man made co2 causes most or all of the warming.

I would expect that you will have a list of thousands right?

 

[futurecurrents]

I forgot to mention the funniest part

"Signatories are approved for inclusion in the Petition Project list if they have obtained formal educational degrees at the level of Bachelor of Science or higher in appropriate scientific fields.'

LOL, you just need a Bachelor's degree to sign this petition but when you sign it, you become a scientist.

LMFAO!
More...

Yes, good observation. And every so called "expert" or "study" that the deniers offer is similarly laughable. They are either not experts in climatology or they are paid for whores for the fossil fuel industry or they are just plain fools that have no credibility.

The deniers have to use orthopedists as their "qualified experts" LOL

The fact remains that NO respected peer reviewed publishing climatologist denies man made global warming or that greenhouse gasses is causing it. Every science org on earth agrees that man has caused of the warming.

It's clear that jerm has ZERO interest in facts or science. He's just a fucking piece of shit liar. The kind that are causing this earth great harm. The earth wants them dead. The sooner the better I say.

 

[exGOPer]

of course some of the names on the list are not going to real... but there are thousands.

There are less than 500 climate scientists on the list from the people who verified it, you should stop embarrassing yourself.

 

[jem]

1. what is your source for that ... snopes?

2. Ok so if there are 500 skeptical scientists and that is 3% of the scientists. (you all like to site your 97% b.s.)

where is your list of 15,000 who state man made co2 is cause warming?

But wait... will you even produce a list of 500?


you pathetic trolls.

i

There are less than 500 climate scientists on the list from the people who verified it, you should stop embarrassing yourself.

 

[exGOPer]

1. what is your source for that ... snopes?

2. Ok so if there are 500 skeptical scientists and that is 3% of the scientists. (you all like to site your 97% b.s.)

where is your list of 15,000 who state man made co2 is cause warming?

But wait... will you even produce a list of 500?


you pathetic trolls.

i

1. Scientific American

2. Of those 'skeptical scientists', many are dead since 1998 and many don't subscribe to the same denial anymore.

3. When did I say there is a list of 15000? If you want the consensus, then visit Trump's EPA page, it has a new study on consensus that backs up my assertion.

4. Just because your memory is fading, doesn't make others trolls. Take your meds.

 

[jem]

15000 would follow if 97% of scientists state man made co2 causes warming.
but... why not just give us a list of say 500 or even 100.

Its odd because when you google for a list of scientists which state man made co2 causes warming... google comes up with non responsive links.

future currents once produced something but I wish to see his source.

by the way... I don't care about a consensus those are bullshit. Science is not made by consensus.

I challenge you to produce scientists will put there name out there even though there is no peer reviewed science showing man made co2 causes warming. Frankly, I would like to read what they use to support their belief. So far every scientist (1 - hansen) who says it refers to the IPCC statement rather than proclaim it themselves as a result of their own work. I suspect Mann would say it... and a couple of guys mann works with. But... I suspect there are very few scientists who state man made co2 causes warming. (there probably are many who state mans activities could cause warming. but I would agree with that statement)

 

[exGOPer]

15000 would follow if 97% of scientists state man made co2 causes warming.
but... why not just give us a list of say 500 or even 100.

Again, check Trump's EPA page for the consensus paper that was peer reviewed, you keep talking as if there was only one consensus study that was done.

 

[jem]

that is such a ridiculous response. who the hell cares what the epa says about the consensus. Nor would I care would trump or obama says. I care about the science.

1. besides all the consensus papers have been debunked.
2. as I said before we don't care about a consensus we care about science
3. the consensus papers almost all speak of man causing warming... not man made co2 causing warming.

Again, check Trump's EPA page for the consensus paper that was peer reviewed, you keep talking as if there was only one consensus study that was done.

 

[exGOPer]

that is such a ridiculous response. who the hell cares what the epa says about the consensus. Nor would I care would trump or obama says. I care about the science.

1. besides all the consensus papers have been debunked.
2. as I said before we don't care about a consensus we care about science
3. the consensus papers almost all speak of man causing warming... not man made co2 causing warming.

1. Lie, the EPA lists upto date papers on consensus

2. Science is built on consensus

3. Another lie, Trump's EPA disproves your lie even. Your lying is worse than Trump's

4. You forgot to cite where I said 15000 scientists or such, did you lie again, you think I forgot?

 

[jem]

1... you show the paper and I will debunk it or link to the peer reviewed papers which have debunked them. All those crappy papers have been discussed and debunked here on et.

2. Science is built on science not a consensus. Politics is consensus. your statement is borderline retarded.

Why 100 authors? If I were wrong, then one would have been enough! - Albert Einstein

Consensus is utterly irrelevant to science. The philosophy of science is devoid of consensus. What concerns science is not weight of numbers on the side of an argument, but what the facts are. What the evidence is.

http://capacityofliberty.blogspot.com/2011/01/100-authors-against-einstein-scientific.html

3. If I am lying cite the all the papers you lying ass pieces of shit. I have read all of these lies before from fc... and we beat him up on that fact. when you read the consensus papers they speak of man made warming very few if any state man made co2 causes warmng. I don't lie asshole... that is what dnc trolls like you do.

4. I explained you troll that the 15,000 number arises from the lie that there is your side claims there is a 97% consensus ... you cited the number 500 which is a bout 3% of 15000..

brain... you should use it.

1. Lie, the EPA lists upto date papers on consensus

2. Science is built on consensus

3. Another lie, Trump's EPA disproves your lie even. Your lying is worse than Trump's

4. You forgot to cite where I said 15000 scientists or such, did you lie again, you think I forgot?