Blahahahahaha.....and perpetual drought in CA.
Also, Antarctica is losing ice on a net basis. Blahahaha
As Climate Changes, Southern States Will Suffer More Than Others
- Thread starter exGOPer
- Start date
Also, Antarctica is losing ice on a net basis. Blahahaha
Next you are going to say there was no pause.
Oh yeah, I forgot it went into the ocean when ocean water is measured after being heated by boat engines.
How could you forget anything? You have to know something first. LOL
Speaking of oceans, where 90% of the earth's heat is.....please point out the pause
I told you there are thousands of skeptical scientists.
its not their job to say man made co2 does not cause warming, its their job to be skeptical.
you have never produceed any peer reviewed science stating man made co2 causes warming.
you would be embarrassed by that fact if you were not a troll.
its not their job to say man made co2 does not cause warming, its their job to be skeptical.
you have never produceed any peer reviewed science stating man made co2 causes warming.
you would be embarrassed by that fact if you were not a troll.
How could you forget anything? You have to know something first. LOL
Speaking of oceans, where 90% of the earth's heat is.....please point out the pause
I know you can go to snopes and they will fudge it up with the leftist baloney...
but I have just backed up my statement below.
start here...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_...tream_scientific_assessment_of_global_warming
and finish here...
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/wor...petition-denying-man-made-global-warming.html
More than 31,000 scientists have signed a petition denying that man is responsible for global warming.
The academics, including 9,000 with PhDs, claim that greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide and methane are actually beneficial for the environment.
The petition was created in 1998 by an American physicist, the late Frederick Seitz, in response to the Kyoto Protocol a year earlier.
It urged the US government to reject the treaty and said: "The proposed limits on greenhouse gases would harm the environment, hinder the advance of science and technology, and damage the health and welfare of mankind."
It added: "There is no convincing scientific evidence that human release of ... greenhouse gases is causing or will, in the forseeable future, cause catastrophic heating of the Earth’s atmosphere and disruption of the Earth’s climate. Moreover, there is substantial scientific evidence that increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide produce many beneficial effects upon the natural plant and animal environments."
but I have just backed up my statement below.
start here...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_...tream_scientific_assessment_of_global_warming
and finish here...
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/wor...petition-denying-man-made-global-warming.html
More than 31,000 scientists have signed a petition denying that man is responsible for global warming.
The academics, including 9,000 with PhDs, claim that greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide and methane are actually beneficial for the environment.
The petition was created in 1998 by an American physicist, the late Frederick Seitz, in response to the Kyoto Protocol a year earlier.
It urged the US government to reject the treaty and said: "The proposed limits on greenhouse gases would harm the environment, hinder the advance of science and technology, and damage the health and welfare of mankind."
It added: "There is no convincing scientific evidence that human release of ... greenhouse gases is causing or will, in the forseeable future, cause catastrophic heating of the Earth’s atmosphere and disruption of the Earth’s climate. Moreover, there is substantial scientific evidence that increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide produce many beneficial effects upon the natural plant and animal environments."
So you post fake news and you preempt it by saying Snopes is leftist baloney when a little research would show you that many names in those so called list are FAKE and a huge number are not even scientists
“Munawwar M. Akhtar” - no info other than the fact that he is a signatory on the petition.
“Fred A. Allehoff” - no info other than the fact that he is a signatory on the petition.
“Ernest J. Andberg” - no info other than the fact that he is a signatory on the petition.
“Joseph J. Arx” - no info other than the fact that he is a signatory on the petition.
“Adolph L. Amundson” - a paper by Amundson on the “London Tunnel Water Treatment System Acid Mine Drainage.” [PDF]
“Henry W. Apfelbach” - an Orthopedic Surgeon
“Joe R. Arechavaleta” - runs an Architect and Engineering company.
In fact, total number who have absolutely any relation to climate change is less than 500.
If this is the depth of your research - an old 1998 thoroughly debunked article to show how scientific your side is, then it's laughable and pathetic at the same time.
I forgot to mention the funniest part
"Signatories are approved for inclusion in the Petition Project list if they have obtained formal educational degrees at the level of Bachelor of Science or higher in appropriate scientific fields.'
LOL, you just need a Bachelor's degree to sign this petition but when you sign it, you become a scientist.
LMFAO!
"Signatories are approved for inclusion in the Petition Project list if they have obtained formal educational degrees at the level of Bachelor of Science or higher in appropriate scientific fields.'
LOL, you just need a Bachelor's degree to sign this petition but when you sign it, you become a scientist.
LMFAO!
of course some of the names on the list are not going to real... but there are thousands.
plus the real laugh here is that you don't have one peer reviewed article which states man made co2 causes warming (which does not rely on a failed model) yet here are 1350 peer reviewed articles that are on the skeptical side....
http://www.populartechnology.net/2009/10/peer-reviewed-papers-supporting.html
plus the real laugh here is that you don't have one peer reviewed article which states man made co2 causes warming (which does not rely on a failed model) yet here are 1350 peer reviewed articles that are on the skeptical side....
http://www.populartechnology.net/2009/10/peer-reviewed-papers-supporting.html
Yes, good observation. And every so called "expert" or "study" that the deniers offer is similarly laughable. They are either not experts in climatology or they are paid for whores for the fossil fuel industry or they are just plain fools that have no credibility.
The deniers have to use orthopedists as their "qualified experts" LOL
The fact remains that NO respected peer reviewed publishing climatologist denies man made global warming or that greenhouse gasses is causing it. Every science org on earth agrees that man has caused of the warming.
It's clear that jerm has ZERO interest in facts or science. He's just a fucking piece of shit liar. The kind that are causing this earth great harm. The earth wants them dead. The sooner the better I say.