Arizona Superintendent: Illegals Will Bankrupt Schools

Daily Caller News Foundation
2014-07-22T052412Z_1_LYNXMPEA6L075_RTROPTP_4_USA-IMMIGRATION-JUDGES-e1408652125676.jpg

4:16 PM 08/21/2014
Blake Neff


A possible amnesty for illegal immigrants could be devastating to Arizona’s public schools, warned state superintendent John Huppenthal.

The law already requires state governments to educate all children, regardless of their legal status, but Huppenthal still said that a widespread amnesty for illegal immigrants, which it has been rumored President Obama may unilaterally implement, could encourage fresh arrivals and inundate the state’s education system with additional migrants.

“In the past there have been complex effects … depending on how it’s worded, how it’s structured, how it’s administered,” Huppenthal said of immigration reform efforts. “All of these things could inadvertently open up the flood and hit us, hit us hard.”

He produced figures making the claim that if 10,000 additional illegal immigrants were added to the state’s schools, the price tag would surpass $50 million for the state’s taxpayers.

Huppenthal’s press conference was accompanied by the release of a letter in which he asked the federal government for $1 million to help with the education of over 200 migrant children who have crossed the border in recent months and been sent to Arizona prior to deportation hearings.

“Having to pay for the tremendous educational costs associated with the federal government’s failure to secure the border is not new to Arizona taxpayers or Arizona schools,” Huppenthal said in the letter. “What is new, though, and what is unprecedented, is the federal government’s actions to relocate at least hundreds of unaccompanied minors … to Arizona’s cities and towns, where they will attend Arizona schools.”

Arizona Democrats quickly accused Huppenthal of attacking immigrant children in a desperate bid to hold on in the upcoming Republican primary in the the state.

“When you’re losing in the polls and it looks like your days as an elected official are numbered, that’s when you start moving towards attacking undocumented kids,” State Sen. Steve Gallardo told the East Valley Tribune.

Huppenthal insisted his abrupt press conference was unrelated to the primary, and was instead prompted by the “imminent” possibility of Obama acting unilaterally on immigration.

Huppenthal has been embattled by accusations that he has flip-flopped on the issue of Common Core, and by the discovery that he made anonymous comments on Internet blogs in which he referred to welfare recipients as “lazy pigs.”
 
Democrats don't care. Jus traise taxes, which of course is their answer for any question. It's not like they're paying the taxes. That's the duty of rich white republicans.
 
It's ultimately a problem created by politicians and a government too eager to get in bed with business. These "immigrants" would not be here were it not for jobs.

The cost of public education for "immigrant" workers' children is part of the true cost of labor. When part of the true cost is shifted away from the employer to the tax payer, a distortion is created. Raising the minimum wage to $10.50/hour, and enforcing it, would decrease distortion of the labor market. Some of these low wage "immigrant" workers would then be displaced with U.S. citizens.

Other industrialized countries go after employers of illegals with stiff penalties, and their labor rules are strictly enforced. In the long run, this is far more effective and less expensive overall (once you've added in the cost of taxpayer subsidized labor) than are fences, dogs, and guns. In the U.S., every now and then, a big employer will be fined a paltry amount for employing illegals -- see Howard Industries, for example --but it is ineffective and halfhearted enforcement. U.S. businesses that employ these low wage workers don't want enforcement, and the government is too willing to oblige.
 
It's ultimately a problem created by politicians and a government too eager to get in bed with business. These "immigrants" would not be here were it not for jobs.
There's the solution, the gov't just needs to get rid of jobs.

Wait...Mission accomplished!

ObamaMission.jpg
 
You are right to some degree. Discouraging the illegal employment would put a dent in the flow of illegals, but what dwarfs that by a huge margin is the illegal and unconstitutional interpretation of the anchor baby law. No honest person can say that the 14th amendment applies to anchor babies. Change that and the flow of illegals is cut dramatically. In fact, I will say that until that is done there isn't any other measure that will amount to anything of substance curtailing the flow of illegals into this country. Highly unlikely that's going to happen as out of the 535 criminals we have in congress, I'd be willing to bet you couldn't find 5 with the balls to take a public position on that. You would not find one presidential candidate.

It's ultimately a problem created by politicians and a government too eager to get in bed with business. These "immigrants" would not be here were it not for jobs.

The cost of public education for "immigrant" workers' children is part of the true cost of labor. When part of the true cost is shifted away from the employer to the tax payer, a distortion is created. Raising the minimum wage to $10.50/hour, and enforcing it, would decrease distortion of the labor market. Some of these low wage "immigrant" workers would then be displaced with U.S. citizens.

Other industrialized countries go after employers of illegals with stiff penalties, and their labor rules are strictly enforced. In the long run, this is far more effective and less expensive overall (once you've added in the cost of taxpayer subsidized labor) than are fences, dogs, and guns. In the U.S., every now and then, a big employer will be fined a paltry amount for employing illegals -- see Howard Industries, for example --but it is ineffective and halfhearted enforcement. U.S. businesses that employ these low wage workers don't want enforcement, and the government is too willing to oblige.
 
Last edited:
I agree with pie to an extent, but many if not most of the illegals work off the books in areas like lawn care (pampered youth today cannot operate lawn mowers apparently), construction and auto repair. Anyway, if they can go on welfare, why work at all?

Raising the minimum wage is a typically dumb idea though. It only increases the incentive to hire people off the books.
 
if we sealed the border and cracked down on illegal immigrant labor... the minimum wage would not have to raised by law... it would happen by market forces and that is the type of inflation we could live with.
If we got rid of income taxes and let the govt fund itself with tariffs the way the country was set up... we would get our middle class jobs back.
 
if we sealed the border and cracked down on illegal immigrant labor... the minimum wage would not have to raised by law... it would happen by market forces and that is the type of inflation we could live with.
If we got rid of income taxes and let the govt fund itself with tariffs the way the country was set up... we would get our middle class jobs back.
Well now you're just talking reality and common sense.
 
Back
Top