Quote from Hydroblunt:
You should have stayed a lurker cause that comment right there says it all. I'll wait to see if you explain urself since maybe you simply omitted clarifying that. But let's just make something clear, all participants of any market cannot win, in fact, most HAVE to lose in order for it to be worthwhile for the winners.
Now, I said it was simplistic.....but from www.investopedia.com...the definition of a zero sum game is:
"What does it Mean? A situation in which one participant's gains result only from another participant's equivalent losses. The net change in total wealth among participants is zero; the wealth is just shifted from one to another.
Investopedia Says... Options and future contracts are examples of zero-sum games (excluding costs). For every person who gains on a contract, there is a counter-party who loses. Gambling is also an example of a zero-sum game.
A stock market, however, is not a zero-sum game because wealth can be created in a stock market"
http://www.investopedia.com/terms/z/zero-sumgame.asp
Look at a chart of GOOG....you think for everyone that made money someone lost it as well? Nope.
Sandy
