@Simples, i kind of did the 100% guarantee thing on my "the nut trade in forex" , "the nut trade in stock" thread, but just a small sample of 10-30 trades on each, and they all turn out good that i did say upfront 100% sure. So that is a little content that i can refer to out there in the open for now, and the type of certainty that we all are interest in is absolute certainty, and what i was chasing with everything i had is this type. It may not occur frequently, but it is there, just have to have enough patience in the middle of the stressful trading environment to participate and thoroughly enough of R&D to see through all the noise to see this type of certainty.
I don't really care but I checked out your stock thread. Honestly, I can't really see the brilliance of shorting FB during this bull-run, and don't really see the decline of price around 56-58-62 with short take profit 52-49 at/after the date 19.12.2013 either. If you then claim that you didn't get filled at those levels and needed to execute, then you're in the same boat as the rest of us retailers, in some degree of uncertainty and having to manage that.
Claiming certainty without any rationale, stats or even specifications is just words, not independently verifiable, and not in any way actionable. When you do it while actively fighting the main trend..., well, should speak for itself really. "Nut trades", good troll thread material.
I think I do get your tactic though: fade fast movers for mean-reverting action. Just not my cup of tea, which would be more in line with trend is your friend. Such "signals" will be short-lived, require needlesharp execution and would be a disservice to try to peddle to innocents.
Also: Isn't this post (w/defunct links) against ET policy and attempt at advertisement?
Last edited:

You missed 33% of the probabilities. In trading that can be lethal when using probabilities.