The problem is people want a 100% holy grail. If I look at a chart, I have a greater than 50% probability of knowing where price will travel. If I include my indicators, that increases to 65%.
So I could call out a trade right now and be wrong, and then you would get a bunch of people say see, that trade did not work, that proves TA does not work.
They can not comprehend that if over time you have more winners than losers, you can make money, but you have to still include money management, trade management, psychology, and other items that make a winning strategy.
Reasons why most traders don't succeed are the same for many businesses.
1) Don't have enough money to trade like a business. If you have only $ 2,000, don't expect to be making $ millions.
2) Don't follow money management. You can only risk a certain % per trade without a single trade wiping you out.
3) You can not be scared to take the trade and leave it room to run. Scared money loses.
4) You have to have some type of edge, which only means that your trading strategy will make you profits over time assuming you can follow the 1st 3 rules.
Quote from Fractal:
What happened in the past is relevant information. For instance, what if you could tell when and at what price a majority of large traders entered their positions? That becomes a significant level: below that in the right context you can expect certain reactions reflected in price. Above that, observing volume, you can also make certain inferences. This is rudimentary.
I'm curious to know if you're marketsurfer, as someone mentioned before. If you are, it wouldn't surprise me that these elemental observations would elude you.