...
How do I do both trades, same instrument, same account, without liquidating the long ES that I put on today?...
You could...
A. Short 10 MES contracts of same month
B. Short ES in the forward contract.
...
How do I do both trades, same instrument, same account, without liquidating the long ES that I put on today?...
You could...
A. Short 10 MES contracts of same month
B. Short ES in the forward contract.
Not the same instrument. I don't want to trade MES.
It is doable to long ES and short 10 MES in the same account, or long current month and short back month.
define illegal? By the books?
I'm not a futures trader, it's been years since I attemped day trading ES.Offsetting trades allow you to see in to the markets when you're not looking, try it overnight, it's fascinating, I can make a newbie student out-trade anyone here instantly, I was generating 50% per quarter seeding a new fund doing exactly this, so much simpler when you're generating marginal returns![]()
Obviously a clarification is needed. Yes, you can trade the back months, not just for the next quarterly but even further out. However, you're looking at very thin volume, and as such, the spread would be insanely wide. So going back to the initial discussion about "offsetting" the same trade using the back month, it just wouldn't make sense (at least for me).That is patently false. Not even for the littlest part.
Actually, ESM3 (June contract) and ESU3 (September contract) are one and the same instrument. You're just opening two different positions. But as I've stated previously, unless you're trading the last 2 weeks before the contract rolls over, when both contracts are actively traded, it wouldn't make much sense to trade the back month due to wide spread.Same goes for current month and the back month. They are two different instruments.
By the book.
Parket entered buy and sell orders in the same products and expiration months, where he reasonably should have known that the entry of the orders would not result in a bona fide market position exposed to market risk in E-Mini S&P Weekly and End-of-Month options on futures. The Panel concluded that Parket violated CME Rule 534.