Are You Right/Left, Authoritarian/Libertarian Take The Test

[RCG Trader]

Quote from Tsing Tao:

I agree with you 100%. Some regulation is necessary and should be the responsibility of the government. But if I were to compare regulation that we should have to what we DO have, it would be like saying we need to get to Chicago, and then overshooting that by Jupiter (the planet).

The Gambinos and the Genoveses would have it no other way, Tsing.

Everyone is on the take in some form or another.

 

[PHOENIX TRADING]

Quote from RCG Trader:

I agree, but that is why the strongly agree vs agree comes in. If you strongly agree, that suggests dogma. Otherwise, you are a leaner. That is what they are getting at.

I am a social Progressive, flat out. The fiscal part I am still working out. Hence, my spot on the scale.

I'm sorry IMHO that is just wrong because they do not know why you are strongly agreeing or weak agreeing.

If I knew the testers bias or intent in the question I could answer correctly otherwise it's a crapshoot.

 

[RCG Trader]

Quote from PHOENIX TRADING:

I'm sorry IMHO that is just wrong because they do not know why you are strongly agreeing or weak agreeing.

If I knew the testers bias or intent in the question I could answer correctly otherwise it's a crapshoot.

True, but all survey have to have a binary ranking scale. That is why those positive and negative numbers come up on our scores, they rank our answers. Could bias slip in? Of course.

 

[Epic]

 

[jficquette]

Quote from RCG Trader:

Well, Darwin has been stretched, as you no doubt know, so I am trying to keep in context with the current definitions.

For example, if we ask Darwin about Social Darwinism, he would give us a blank stare. I think.

My bottom line is that man is not willingly civilized. I think that is Machiavelli is so many words. Leaving him solely to his own devices has not worked in the past, and it will not work now.

Another thought on Darwinsim. The natural world chose Darwinsim as the most efficient vehicle to realize its fullest potential.

Considering that, it follows that our economic system which is a function of natural human interaction is optimized if it follows the rules of the natural world.

Governments interfere with human interaction out of greed, corruption, self interest. This interference retards human progress.

Get rid of government and only then will the human race will begin to realize its fullest potential.

At some point labor will be free, but as long as humans put a price on their labor than economic freedom without government intervention is the best way to go.

 

[Lucrum]

Quote from RCG Trader:

I did not bother to respond because it has been answered ad nauseum.

No more insults tho Luke. You are struggling with a lot, and I cannot in good conscience consider you fair game anymore. The things you post and the lack of understanding you have make sense now. I regret several posts I have made to you, and I wish you only the best in your time of difficulty.

1) you have not answered every issue I brought up in that post

2)you're still suffering from self delusions of grandeur

3)you are the ET King of lack of understanding and even the most basic logic

4)the only difficulty I'm having is losing some weight

 

[Brass]

Quote from Lucrum:

3)you are the ET King of lack of understanding...

Wow, that just rolls right off the tongue. You come up with that one yourself, did you?

 

[Lucrum]

Quote from Brass:

Wow, that just rolls right off the tongue. You come up with that one yourself, did you?

Hey, what time will you performing your daily blow up?

 

[deltastrike]

I'm Ghandi apparently.

 

[pspr]

Quote from deltastrike:

I'm Ghandi apparently.

Wow! We are honored. Do you have a message for us?

(but doesn't your username belie your true nature?)