The trader can increase leverage by a factor of 2 on the other account and keep 100% of the profits for the same risk..
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Thank you all for your inputs. I really have been thinking through the years of trading another people's money offering to protect against losses. The reason is simply increasing income through this service. But:
1. I couldn't become profitable yet and
2. You opened my eyes to aspects of this idea I had not thought of.
It is not just a matter of confidence (if I am profitable then I can multiply the funds by ten and earn a lot more, besides offering protection to people who can't trade by themselves). Your multiple replies (surprising me) showed me that this proposal is not really attractive from any point of view.
The disadvantages for the trader are brilliantly synthesized by Businessman. My disadvantages are clear from various replies: it is not possible to obtain decent return on investment. The trader should be very well paid for the additional risk he would take. I used to think of about 80% of profits to the trader for taking the risk. But this figure kills the business from the beginning.
It was really a poorly thought out proposal and I thank you all again for taking you time to argue about things I should have been aware all the time.
I apologize for such an idiot question but I could not see the obvious. Thanks and thanks again.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Thank you all for your inputs. I really have been thinking through the years of trading another people's money offering to protect against losses. The reason is simply increasing income through this service. But:
1. I couldn't become profitable yet and
2. You opened my eyes to aspects of this idea I had not thought of.
It is not just a matter of confidence (if I am profitable then I can multiply the funds by ten and earn a lot more, besides offering protection to people who can't trade by themselves). Your multiple replies (surprising me) showed me that this proposal is not really attractive from any point of view.
The disadvantages for the trader are brilliantly synthesized by Businessman. My disadvantages are clear from various replies: it is not possible to obtain decent return on investment. The trader should be very well paid for the additional risk he would take. I used to think of about 80% of profits to the trader for taking the risk. But this figure kills the business from the beginning.
It was really a poorly thought out proposal and I thank you all again for taking you time to argue about things I should have been aware all the time.
I apologize for such an idiot question but I could not see the obvious. Thanks and thanks again.

