Something you wish you were.Huh? What would you call a fund manager?
Something you wish you were.Huh? What would you call a fund manager?
lol what a circular bit of mumbo jumbo. I’m not going to try to talk stats to you as it’s clear you’re getting lost in semantics and do not know what you’re talking about. Probability is not a prediction, you make a prediction based upon a probability. If you react, you are still making a prediction lol, based upon your understanding of your probabilities.You are off in the weeds and desperate, lol.
Redeem this mess with a dose of reality, lol.
Read some, it won't kill ya...
predictability vs probability
https://www.dogpile.com/serp?q=predictability+vs+probability
Noobs fall prey to the idea that any single trade is successful judged by that one result.
Not true, prediction-breath, nooo.
It is the net result of a signifigant collection of accurately executed benchmarked setup and trigger combos that determine if the system is operating as shown previously to do during testing. Was it Solomon that said: "Predicting is for paupers. Reacting is for Kangs."
You wanna predict and guess, join the carnival, lol.
*yawn*Something you wish you were.
There you go. So you finally admit it.Probability is not a prediction
I never said probabilities = prediction lolThere you go. So you finally admit it.
So what good is your carnival contest as relates to Price Action Trading?
Also
What does your contest say about 95% of "Price Action Traders", those without stats?
View attachment 307989
“Price action” is a hackneyed term used by course sellers. “Bar-by-bar” is sometimes used in conjunction.Yes but a lot of folk on here claim that they’re day trading with price action.
I’m happy to do something for a longer time frame I just want to make sure it’s a test that people think is fair.
Not so fast, Kreskin, lol.anyway, price action continues to be a poor technique in assessing what direction price will move to next.
What evidence would you accept lolNot so fast, Kreskin, lol.
Before you run out the back door of the tent with the money
Your conclusion is erronious in the extreme.
It speaks to the practitioners of "Price Action Trading" who responded to your
circus contest but it does not at all address the effectiveness of the technique
called "Price Action Trading".
Prove me wrong.
View attachment 307991
What have you presented that addresses the effectiveness of the technique called "Price Action Trading".What evidence would you accept lol
Psss: Can I make a suggestion, you'll get nowhere debating with some of these characters, waste of time and talent.What evidence would you accept lol