Quote from nazzdack:
1) They aren't the "best", they're the "least worst".
2) How do they compare to the S&P-500?
3) They make fewer "mistakes" probably because they are mimicking the S&P-500 or overweighted in fixed income. :eek:
4) They may perform "well" merely because they are too risk averse in bear markets. More data needs to be compiled which will show they tend towards the performance of men as their assets under management increase.![]()
So being risk averse in a bear market is a bad thing?

