Originally posted by Paterfamilias
Turn of phrase does not an argument make. You understand that, don't you?![]()
"Your second sentence contradicts your first."
"Actually it does."
"By definition the system cannot function without its constituent parts. That much should be obvious."
"As am I. My only point is that saying day traders are extraneous or not necessary to the "system" of equity markets is wholly mistaken."
"You can play word games all you like. I'm not interested. What I'm saying to you is that the system we have would not function without day traders. You can argue terms and definitions all you like. You haven't given me scrap one of evidence to the contrary however. I'd love to hear a real opposing argument, but just saying that day traders are unethical or unnecessary or not a true part of the system is false and not really an argument but an opinion. If you and that other guy Option-something think I'm wrong, fine. I can live with that."
"You write nice paragraphs with plenty of big words but you fail to analyze anything, misguided or not. The semantic content of all your posts has been about nil. Again, that's fine but don't foist your own shortcomings upon me."
"Well stated. I guess it's a draw then."
Originally posted by Paterfamilias
You write nice paragraphs with plenty of big words but you fail to analyze anything, misguided or not. The semantic content of all your posts has been about nil. Again, that's fine but don't foist your own shortcomings upon me.
Paternally yours![]()
Originally posted by Paterfamilias
You can willfully ignore the argument all you like but it doesn't make you right.![]()
"Just because you can't see my argument doesn't mean it doesn't exist....."
"You can play word games all you like. I'm not interested. What I'm saying to you is that the system we have would not function without day traders. You can argue terms and definitions all you like. You haven't given me scrap one of evidence to the contrary however. I'd love to hear a real opposing argument, but just saying that day traders are unethical or unnecessary or not a true part of the system is false and not really an argument but an opinion. If you and that other guy Option-something think I'm wrong, fine. I can live with that."
Originally posted by ChrisM
So, who is ethical in modern capitalism ? Big corporate leaders spending nights and days thinking how to cook the books and not being caught ? They are people of success, teaching others what to do and how to be useful for the society, but only independent mind can see, that most of them are little people with very mediocre personality. Better slaves of the system, treating lower slaves like a trash.
Who else then ? Politicians ? Yeah, forget it![]()
Lawyers ? Even better joke, isn`t it ? Doctors ? Maybe old fashioned style, if some still survived, the others are just medical business reps![]()
We can go with this much further, but can You see where the difference is ?
Traders have no unions, association, they don`t corrupt anybody, they do not use kids in third world countries to work for them, they don`t kill anybody, they don`t sell drugs, and finally ... they don`t make money on someonethe, who got the cancer. That`s why they are easy targets.
If we want to find hard working class people, which are ethical, hopefully not from advertisement, marketing or sales ???? Because anybody trying to be ethical in these fields wouldn`t keep his job for long.
As professional trader I feel frankly more ethical, then when I worked for the big companies which forced me to be an animal to others.
Originally posted by aphexcoil
If trading is gambling, then it offers truly better odds than any that you will see in a casino. When was the last time you were in a zero-sum casino? I'm sure someone will steal that name and use it for a casino now!
My final take on markets (especially index markets) is that they aren't random all the time. They are only random a random amount of time and the other times they are trending.
aphie
Originally posted by doublea
And who said a job has to benefit society? (Not that I agree that trading does not, it certainly does.) Try reading some Rand, ladies.![]()