"Are those Democrats or Republicans out there?"

C6VVMyeWYAAimWl.jpg



Harvard Study Reveals Huge Extent of Anti-Trump Media Bias
By Heat Street Staff|7:24 am, May 19, 2017


A major new study out of Harvard University has revealed the true extent of the mainstream media’s bias against Donald Trump.

Academics at the Shorenstein Center on Media, Politics and Public Policy analyzed coverage from Trump’s first 100 days in office across 10 major TV and print outlets.

They found that the tone of some outlets was negative in as many as 98% of reports, significantly more hostile than the first 100 days of the three previous administrations:



tone1.jpg



The academics based their study on seven US outlets and three European ones.

In America they analyzed CNN, NBC, CBS, Fox News, the New York Times, the Washington Post and the Wall Street Journal.

They also took into account the BBC, the UK’s Financial Timesand the German public broadcaster ARD.

Every outlet was negative more often than positive.

Only Fox News, which features some of Trump’s most enthusiastic supporters and is often given special access to the President, even came close to positivity.

Fox was ranked 52% negative and 48% positive.

The study also divided news items across topics. On immigration, healthcare, and Russia, more than 85% of reports were negative.

On the economy, the proportion was more balanced – 54% negative to 46% positive:



tone2.jpg



The study highlighted one exception: Trump got overwhelmingly positive coverage for launching a cruise missile attack on Syria.

Around 80% of all reports were positive about that.

The picture was very different for other recent administrations. The study found that President Obama’s first 100 days got a good write-up overall – with 59% of reports positive.

Bill Clinton and George W Bush got overall negative coverage, it found, but to a much lesser extent than Trump. Clinton’s first 100 days got 40% positivity, while Bush’s got 43%:



other-presidents-tone.jpg



Trump has repeatedly claimed that his treatment by the media is unprecedented in its hostility.

This study suggests that, at least when it comes to recent history, he’s right.





Lastest job approval ratings has trump 60% negative and 36 % positive.If the people think he is doing a bad job why wouldn't the media.Trump has also attacked the media more than any other President but your side expect them to be nice to him.
 
Lastest job approval ratings has trump 60% negative and 36 % positive.If the people think he is doing a bad job why wouldn't the media.Trump has also attacked the media more than any other President but your side expect them to be nice to him.
Are these the same poll ratings that gave HIllary a 97% chance of winning? ..

upload_2017-6-14_12-35-16.png
 
Let me say that shooting politicians from any political party is wrong. Whether it is Gabrielle Giffords or the shooting today we should all step up and state that this is wrong. The overheated political rhetoric from both sides that drives lone nutcases to do these type of shootings is also to blame. It would be much better to debate & disagree on the issues but not frame politicians in a hateful manner. It is time for everyone to be more civil in their discourse.
 
How could a thread about a shooting where Republicans were targeted by a Left-Wing Gunman get off-track/misdirected into a discussion about the media?

Here is a simple way to keep score:
During Obama's 8 Years did a Republican Gunman target and shoot at multiple Democrat Congressman?
During Obama's 8 Years did anyone employed by Fox News produce images depicting a decapitated Obama?

Sure, anyone can dig up images from the deepest darkest corners of the internet showing Obama being lynched, but you can't tell me they came from someone employed at Fox who was in a similar position as Kathy Griffin at CNN?

Dishonorable Mention for the Plays in NYC depicting the assassination of Donald Trump that are applauded on a daily basis.
 
Back
Top