Are there more risks with indices?

From what I’ve heard (someone told me last evening), equal weighted funds are more prone to losses. You think that’s true? Sorry I’m throwing so many questions at you :)

Not true. In fact, the opposite.

I think it's safe to say the "standard of market risk" for traders is the SP500 and/or the Dow 30. From there you either go for higher potential profit with higher risk or for less risk... the "equal weighted SP500" would be such a play as would a fund or ETF in Utilities... as well as bonds or some sort of "balanced" vehicle such as one that is part stocks and part bonds.
 
Like Launce said, these are good combinations to go for. Your portfolio’s sensitivity to market swings will be reduced because they move in the opposite directions.
 
Whatever you guys say, I think considering where to place either of these two is important. Technical analysis here can prove helpful. So, always select brokers who have a good range of technical tools. I started trading with fxview, pepperstone, and xtb and after due deliberation, I’m sticking to fxview and xtb.
So how many pips do you think should the stop loss be?
 
I don’t know I get so confused sometimes between market and equal weighted funds, how does one outperform the other!?
I think so too Mark. They come with high turnover that directly results in the higher expense ratios and higher capital taxes.
 
Based on my research, these equal weighted indices are slightly better for enhancing the bank balance over a long period of time, considering you can withhold the volatility.
 
Based on my research, these equal weighted indices are slightly better for enhancing the bank balance over a long period of time, considering you can withhold the volatility.
It all sums up to the trading costs really. I’ve been trading indices with fxview and swissquote and their fee is comparatively low. Maybe the fees got overshadowed by the excellent performance of these indices.
 
Back
Top