Quote from fluttrader:
most forex bookies don't hedge the trades from the winning traders and then you arrive to situations like posted in the above example.
(men don't needs asses, women do
)
Asses or arses, guess that's another forum
Ok, let's say you're a marketmaker (come on, play along, wear dark glasses and a wig so no-one recognizes you) 90% of your clients lose money consistently and 10% of your clients are consistently profitable.
The 90% take care of themselves pretty much (although even a stopped clock is right twice a day!), they don't need any help and their money is money in the bank for you. But there's always a risk with these novices that they're just crazy enough to bet the farm on some data or other and get lucky so to protect yourself you have a system of requoting and manual execution to prevent orders being filled at prices which basically don't exist in the underlying market. No problem, those suckers are nailed but they probably deserve it, forex is no place for the uninitiated. Among the 90% are a few jokers scalping a pip here and there using latency or some such tactic, no need to close their accounts because they'll probably lose in the end anyway but if they get too risky just put them on manual execution, you're not letting a few chancers take advantage. All sounds fair and reasonable so far.
The other 10% make some decent returns with some pretty decent volume from which you earn spread and of course shade, as well as having the convenience of the in-house liquidity they provide. You've got a couple of choices with them, do you screw them by running their stops, reversing their trades, and all the other dubious practices thereby burning their business, the revenue it produces, and your reputation in the industry, or do you run a book and hedge their trades with your liquidity providers? Which is the easier and more viable for you as a businessman?
No prizes for the answer!