FL/OP,
When you ask a question like this, what are you looking for?
Everyone seems convinced that there are none, I guess I want someone to step up and prove otherwise.
FL/OP,
When you ask a question like this, what are you looking for?
ITM success, not OTM success.
However, traders of the underlying don't usually have a 100% loss on their individual positions. Net long options positions like you are talking about are frequently a 100% loss.Can ITM's appreciate the way OTM's do ?
You can risk X to return 4x with an OTM something you can't really do while buying the underlying. Those are the types of trades I am looking for otherwise I can just trade the underlying.
Everyone seems convinced that there are none, I guess I want someone to step up and prove otherwise.

However, traders of the underlying don't usually have a 100% loss on their individual positions. Net long options positions like you are talking about are frequently a 100% loss.
If someone sits on their hands and takes a 100% loss on their long option position, that person is not a trader. They are an idiot.

If someone sits on their hands and takes a 100% loss on their long option position, that person is not a trader. They are an idiot.