Quote from chanakya:
Exactly right !
The call option writer is passing on part of the $$ to the option buyer.
lets assume the company has an IPO of $10
john bought the $10 and immediately wrote $1 call which carl bought. now john has invested $9 on the company and carl is ivested $1 in the same company...the option transaction has just passed part of the investment from one party to other.
in normal transaction, the entire stock gets transferred where as here portion of the investment gets transferred as two diffferent players have taken up different parts of investements ( based in risk. John has taken the intrinsic value and the carl the speculative.
If john had sold the $10 stock ( instead of option) to carl, then carl would have been 100% invested in the company having both the instrinsic and speculative part.
Look at it in a more clear way. Ignore that john and carl knew each other:
If you write an option, over the long haul, your risk-adjusted reward will be near zero. It has not been proven that writing options is a very longterm strategy. People sometimes make money for a few years, and then blow up some month. And you have costs, fees, and slippage.
If you purchase options, over the long haul, your risk adjusted reward will probably be negative, since options depreciate. And you have costs, fees, and slippage.
If you own a stock (here the underlying), it may go up or down. The stock market generally goes up (which has nothing to do with the options), but no guarantee in the short run. And you have costs, fees, and slippage.
The market is very efficient. All these instruments play off each other in their pricing. Naive "what-ifs" make money only for the brokers and exchanges. And you have costs, fees, and slippage.
