XYZ stock is 100. A "natural" call fly would be 100/110/120 (+1,-2,+1) say it's a 5.00 debit. Say the same put fly is 4.50. Both of these have three legs. The iron fly is 100/110/110/120 (+1 put, -1 put, -1 call, +1 call) is a 4.75 credit (which is 10-4.75=5.25 debit). All of these are synthetically equivalent. The difference in price is due to micro-structure. I will typically choose the tighter one (smaller bid/ask spread). In general OTM options are tighter than deep ITM. Or if the underlying pays a dividend, you may want to trade the iron (or put fly) to avoid the dividend risk that is inherent with being long an ITM call.
How about +2 +1 -2 +1 +2?
Anyone reminds of a good topic, here in ET, with a deep discussion about flies (debit) vs iron flies (credit) ?
I just know the simplistic approach "go for flies when IV is low and iron flies wen IV is high".
You never heard of Iron Butterflys?
Is that a Fibonacci sequence? How about posting something useful.
This is incorrect right here. Flies and Iron Flies are synthetic equivalents; the only difference is that flies are entered into for a debit and can expand up to max profit while iron flies are entered into for a credit and could potentially expire worthless (short options ATM) giving you max profit.Anyone reminds of a good topic, here in ET, with a deep discussion about flies (debit) vs iron flies (credit) ?
I just know the simplistic approach "go for flies when IV is low and iron flies wen IV is high".