The OP isn't trying to recruit you to a scheme. He is essentially a founder, and someone like you (an investor) is giving him free money that he could either leverage into more money or use, i.e. he's not going to lose money and could make money. The word "arbitrage" isn't a good description of the situation, but it is essentially a free call option for him. He's just asking what would be a good way to leverage this to make money. Perhaps it's dumb money, government's trying to be angel investors often are, but it's apparently out there and he's getting it legally and it will have zero impact on you unless you're a Romania taxpayer, so not sure what the hostility is about?
>> The word "arbitrage" isn't a good description of the situation, but it is essentially a free call option for him.
Exactly, the term "arbitrage" might be misleading and carrying a negative conotation but I meant that mathematically. "A self-financing trading strategy ϕ is called an arbitrage opportunity if its value process V satisfies V0 ≤ 0, VT ≥ 0 and P(VT>0) > 0" ( https://quant.stackexchange.com/questions/31953/different-definitions-of-arbitrage ). The total value of the company I produced so far is V0 = 0. After getting the investment, researching what's to be researched and developing what't to be developed - completing the product that is, running my own capital (different from the investment I'm getting), sales and what takes, the total value of the company will be VT >= 0 since it could only be less than zero if I were in debt which is not the case, I'm running on debit not on credit. And PROBABILITY of having a valuable company is P(VT) > 0 (NON-ZERO!) since it would only be zero if I'd be after embezzlement, which again I'm not.
>> Perhaps it's dumb money, government's trying to be angel investors often are
I'm not commenting on this one since as a (potential) beneficiary I might not be totally objective
Just saying that administration everywhere in this world is about way more needs and claims than actual resources available so it's inevitable for some to be dissatisfied.The program I applied to has a budget of €477,000,000 and at about €38,000 per financed business minus administration expenses that's about 10,000 new businesses. That's the reason I said I wouldn't call you "competitor" if you'd be eligible for financing and apply too, there's enough in the pot so the competition need not be cut throat.
And this budget is pocket change compared to other EU programs like this one: "Horizon 2020 is the EU Research and Innovation programme with nearly €80 billion of funding available over 7 years (2014 to 2020)" ( https://ec.europa.eu/programmes/horizon2020/en/what-horizon-2020 ).
And yeah, all these investments may be dumb money and return nada, but those money are going out the window whether I apply or not. So it's almost a duty to try and get some since in spite of what some may think, (what the hostility is about?), I'm actually well-intended.
Last edited:
