I think its important to look carefully at the premarket. In this instance what I am looking for, are "tests" of a "landmark" (in this case the 200 period ema). When I see that price respects that landmark in the premarket, it suggests to me that price may again respect that line in future. Actually I know this to be true because I have put in the screen time. So what I am more interested in, is how price acts around the 200.
Today, price opened "in value", meaning somewhere in between the previous day's value area high at 911.50 and value are low at 904. When price "tested" 904 soon after the open, a long entry at 904 would have resulted in a nice profitable trade (refer to the attached chart).
If you follow the early move off the open, you can see that price drove up from 904, through the previous day's value area high at 911 and up to a "local high" of 916.25 about a half hour later.
price then retraced back to the 200 period ema (and the previous day's value area high at 911). As I have mentioned in previous posts, when I see that kind of confluence, and my filters ($VOLD, $ADD, etc) give confirmation, THATS A BET I AM WILLING TO TAKE.
So actually we have two possible scenarios.
1. A trader could have entered long at 904, scaled out to 10 pts and kept a couple of contracts in case the trade continued to run in his/her favor, or
2. The trader could have cashed out at 12 pts and then waited for another shot. Seeing the test (and confluence at 911) a new trade could be put on at that point. If a trader entered long at 911, they would have taken only 1 tick heat. That entry would have resulted in another 5 or 6 points depending on the exit.
As can be seen, there were multiple tests and retests that an aggressive trader could have made good use of.
Today, price opened "in value", meaning somewhere in between the previous day's value area high at 911.50 and value are low at 904. When price "tested" 904 soon after the open, a long entry at 904 would have resulted in a nice profitable trade (refer to the attached chart).
If you follow the early move off the open, you can see that price drove up from 904, through the previous day's value area high at 911 and up to a "local high" of 916.25 about a half hour later.
price then retraced back to the 200 period ema (and the previous day's value area high at 911). As I have mentioned in previous posts, when I see that kind of confluence, and my filters ($VOLD, $ADD, etc) give confirmation, THATS A BET I AM WILLING TO TAKE.
So actually we have two possible scenarios.
1. A trader could have entered long at 904, scaled out to 10 pts and kept a couple of contracts in case the trade continued to run in his/her favor, or
2. The trader could have cashed out at 12 pts and then waited for another shot. Seeing the test (and confluence at 911) a new trade could be put on at that point. If a trader entered long at 911, they would have taken only 1 tick heat. That entry would have resulted in another 5 or 6 points depending on the exit.
As can be seen, there were multiple tests and retests that an aggressive trader could have made good use of.
But, I owe you one! Thanks!
My computer skills...:eek: