Apple Silicon and IB TWS

Its what support told me...And they insisted that was the case when I question it because it makes no sense.

It would be beyond retarded to the point of lunacy if that was the way it was done

My bet, its not.

IB did not last 35 years by being that stupid
 
...
Code doesn't age. If it was written well in the first place, I don't see any reason to rewrite it. Scala runs on the JVM. So if that Java code was well-written, what benefit would there be to rewrite it using a different language that runs on the same VM?

Even the best written code will be develop inefficiency over such a long period. Design wise , and who knows what else

A complete rewrite would be very expensive, and produce little net benefit , other than to the complainers
 
IB must really throw their garbage software into dustbin and release an fully new software which fits in 2020's condititions. Look at Think or Swim or Webull. They have amazing fast and beautiful software and we IB users are using a software from Windows XP.

IB's CEOs or directors must be ashamed if they see the other broker's softwares...
 
IB must really throw their garbage software into dustbin and release an fully new software which fits in 2020's condititions. Look at Think or Swim or Webull. They have amazing fast and beautiful software and we IB users are using a software from Windows XP.

IB's CEOs or directors must be ashamed if they see the other broker's softwares...

Windows 95 was the dominant operating system when TWS was released.
 
Even the best written code will be develop inefficiency over such a long period. Design wise , and who knows what else

A complete rewrite would be very expensive, and produce little net benefit , other than to the complainers

I presume you are not a programmer... Companies spend billions on bug fixes yearly. Rewriting any multi million line code from a clean sheet gives a far better vision for the future than remain the same old. Staying with the same buggy code to me is a "union" style thinking because this would eliminate sub performing coders from the company. Just look at how companies such as Google/FB/NetFlix/etc spend on their apps which won't last some X number of years. A perfect example here is the "good riddance" Google Music. I am not suggesting Google Music was a poorly written app.
 
I presume you are not a programmer... Companies spend billions on bug fixes yearly. Rewriting any multi million line code from a clean sheet gives a far better vision for the future than remain the same old. Staying with the same buggy code to me is a "union" style thinking because this would eliminate sub performing coders from the company. Just look at how companies such as Google/FB/NetFlix/etc spend on their apps which won't last some X number of years. A perfect example here is the "good riddance" Google Music. I am not suggesting Google Music was a poorly written app.


You presume wrong. Your record of being wrong......perfect
 
Back
Top