Quote from Curve:
Im not a tech guy which is why I'm here for advice. I need to run about 120 algos on a simulator simultaneously and 5 or so live, alot of which are cross-market strategies. Obviously low-latency is paramount along with the ability to create (or recreate in my case) new algos with ease in a time-efficient manner.
If you know of any other options I sure would like to hear about them rather than parting with the $100,000+ that these platforms cost.
Quote from Curve:
Im not a tech guy which is why I'm here for advice. I need to run about 120 algos on a simulator simultaneously and 5 or so live, alot of which are cross-market strategies. Obviously low-latency is paramount along with the ability to create (or recreate in my case) new algos with ease in a time-efficient manner.
If you know of any other options I sure would like to hear about them rather than parting with the $100,000+ that these platforms cost.
Quote from rayl:
StreamBase as in the streams processing DB?
Stonebraker is a great mind in the DB community and I know of at least one bulge bracket firm quite happy with it for things as simple as VWAP to much more complex stuff.
However, I would think that unless you need [extended] SQL interoperability between StreamBase and a historical data DB, it's probably better to go with a simpler solution. That's the true appeal... test your algo on historical data and then throw it at the real time stream, w/o risk of introducing any errors as you're running the same SQL.
Curious as to know your use case for StreamBase.
Quote from Curve:
Im not a tech guy which is why I'm here for advice. I need to run about 120 algos on a simulator simultaneously and 5 or so live, alot of which are cross-market strategies. Obviously low-latency is paramount along with the ability to create (or recreate in my case) new algos with ease in a time-efficient manner.
If you know of any other options I sure would like to hear about them rather than parting with the $100,000+ that these platforms cost.