Anyone using Notion for Journaling?
- Thread starter Sprout
- Start date
I've been researching and consuming youtube content frequently lately and came across a Logseq plugin: get-youtube-captions.
It's been a game-changer in my ability to digest and assimilate information and transform it into useful knowledge.
It imports Youtube transcripts easily into Logseq.
Now exploring how to integrate with openAI to get summaries.
PKM's are such a rich vein to increase one's productivity and it's been enjoyable to link and cross-reference topics.
It's been a game-changer in my ability to digest and assimilate information and transform it into useful knowledge.
It imports Youtube transcripts easily into Logseq.
Now exploring how to integrate with openAI to get summaries.
PKM's are such a rich vein to increase one's productivity and it's been enjoyable to link and cross-reference topics.
Last edited:
Chuckle o' da day...
Didn't know what PKM stands for...
Quick search yields several pages for PK Machine gun!!
Refined search to "PKM productivity", and voila! Personal Knowledge Management.
Using an AI script to assimilate and transform youtube captions might be deadly!!
As an aside, I wonder what the knowledge graph in the 1992 movie Lawnmower Man would look like today. Maybe unusable or non-beneficial??
Didn't know what PKM stands for...
Quick search yields several pages for PK Machine gun!!
Refined search to "PKM productivity", and voila! Personal Knowledge Management.
Using an AI script to assimilate and transform youtube captions might be deadly!!
As an aside, I wonder what the knowledge graph in the 1992 movie Lawnmower Man would look like today. Maybe unusable or non-beneficial??
Coming up with some organization complexities.
Citation numbers and indexing in general are unintentionally linking and not informative.
@tiddlywinks any suggestions?
My intention with this section is mapping out Cognitive Bias specific to Trader's.
I've been looking but haven't come across a flowchart to determine a trader's cognitive bias
Citation numbers and indexing in general are unintentionally linking and not informative.
@tiddlywinks any suggestions?
My intention with this section is mapping out Cognitive Bias specific to Trader's.
I've been looking but haven't come across a flowchart to determine a trader's cognitive bias
hmmm... unintentional linking doesn't sound right. lol
Create a crude drawing for me... 2 or 3 nodes is enough. hand-drawn is fine. PM or post.
My initial linear thought of the question is something like this... probably not helpful.
Top50 Index
> Item#1 w/block insert citation
> Item#2 w/block insert citation
> Item#3 w/block insert citation
Citation Index
From the previous Graph
"13" is both a citation number of a linked reference in Etymology Page as well as an index number for Neglecting Probability Bias Page
This is the Graph I'm attempting to map;
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/65/Cognitive_bias_codex_en.svg
It seems like any use of numbers to facilitate indexing will create unintentional linked associations
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/65/Cognitive_bias_codex_en.svg
It seems like any use of numbers to facilitate indexing will create unintentional linked associations
I think I would use link aliases for starters...
[Neglecting Probability Bias] ([[13]])
[Etymology] ([[13]])
the text in single [] becomes the link.
[Neglecting Probability Bias] ([[13]])
[Etymology] ([[13]])
the text in single [] becomes the link.
Openai Open.ai Chatbot for the assist
https://www.elitetrader.com/et/threads/open-ai-chatbot.371429/