Quote from spersky:
I just manually backtested about 12 months of the Daily E-minis using this system. Basically it was not successful because of 2 reasons. The keltner channel range was very wide making the stops unacceptable. There where trends during that period that did not fade from Nov 2004 to dec 2005.
Your testing confirms the weak points of this method. Thanks, and if you can backtest some intraday data and come back to us with some figures, that would be even more helpful.
But my understanding is that the method already has the solutions "built in", which is the money management and risk control. A system is not complete when it is lacking these later parts.
1.
reduce the position size if stop is wider, don't enter when stop is too wide to your risk profile;
2. done trading for the day after the
first stop out.
This is by far the most completed divergence trading plan I have found, I plan to watch it for a longer time. But even I decide to trade this, I will not trade it along. Simply adding confirmations from other strategies like support/resistance, fib # and multiple timeframes can increase its reliability.
The use of the keltner ban, the Parabolic stops and the ADX filter are all bright ideas. But a setup is just a setup, nothing more, nothing less. The same setup that looks good today can easily fail tomorrow. This is where the risk control and the money management come in and why they are so important to any trading plans.
Some people are concerned about the ADX above 30 level, which we all know LBR uses it to setup her "Holy Grail" trades. So far we have no prove how valid the filter is applying to the divergence trades. We need some smart ones provide backtest results. My guess is this divergence method can be a very good post "Holy Grail" setup, but we really need confirmations telling us that the trend is indeed weakening...