Anyone trades with quad core?

A

a529612

Once you tried it, there's no turning back. I'm running apps all over the place and the CPU load rarely goes over 5%. My dual core laptop feels like a turtle in comparison. :)
 
Definitely worth it. Everything runs faster, even my p&l.

Quote from a529612:

Once you tried it, there's no turning back. I'm running apps all over the place and the CPU load rarely goes over 5%. My dual core laptop feels like a turtle in comparison. :)
More...
 
Quote from Tracy McGreedy:

Definitely worth it. Everything runs faster, even my p&l.
More...


So technically your computer is slooooooooooow b/c I'm assuming your p & l is negative.



:D :D :D
 
Quad cores only show significant improvement in VERY multi-threaded apps...
Such as very complex games and multi-media.

Trading apps are not intensive at all...
Unless you have coded custom real-time tick processing apps.

Any improvement is probably an illusion.
 
Intel E6750 FSB 2080 Mhz @ 4160 Mhz.
None can beat it

Q6600 is a like a Pentium4....... compared to this machine :D

e6750max2fo9.gif


Ares:cool:
 
Quote from QuantPlus:

Quad cores only show significant improvement in VERY multi-threaded apps...
Such as very complex games and multi-media.

Trading apps are not intensive at all...
Unless you have coded custom real-time tick processing apps.

Any improvement is probably an illusion.
More...

Interesting. I got all excited about my top-of-the-line dual core machine when it came about 18 moths ago. But I was quickly frozen out during busy parts of the trading day. I discovered that my front end trading software only loads up one chip at a time. Your trading software most likely does this as well. I could have a 20-core machine, and it wouldn't make a difference. My dual core machine was probably even slower than my old machine, because I gave up 2.8 CPU for a 2.4 dual core.

My task manager CPU graph was maxed out all the time. The two CPU's couldn't help each other at all. Now I'm tempted to get one of these super-duper quad cores, but I believe the same thing will happen - all these CPU's and I won't be able to have more than one working at a time. Is this true? If so, a colossal waste of money has been enacted against the computer buying public. I Love what computers can do for trading, but I swear I don't know if there's a hamster running on a little wheel in there. Are these quad core performance gains an "illusion"?
 
Quote from wilburbear:

Interesting. I got all excited about my top-of-the-line dual core machine when it came about 18 moths ago. But I was quickly frozen out during busy parts of the trading day. I discovered that my front end trading software only loads up one chip at a time. Your trading software most likely does this as well. I could have a 20-core machine, and it wouldn't make a difference. My dual core machine was probably even slower than my old machine, because I gave up 2.8 CPU for a 2.4 dual core.

My task manager CPU graph was maxed out all the time. The two CPU's couldn't help each other at all. Now I'm tempted to get one of these super-duper quad cores, but I believe the same thing will happen - all these CPU's and I won't be able to have more than one working at a time. Is this true? If so, a colossal waste of money has been enacted against the computer buying public. I Love what computers can do for trading, but I swear I don't know if there's a hamster running on a little wheel in there. Are these quad core performance gains an "illusion"?
More...

Are you using eSignal charting Platform or what Charting Platform... :confused:

<img src="http://www.enflow.com/p.gif">
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top