Quote from Maverick74:
These things are not mutually exclusive. In other words, spending a lot of money does not guarantee success because the organizations can still be run poorly. But if I had to pick between Beane and Cuban, I would take Beane walking away.
As far as selling at the top, sure, that was a smart move. I've sold a lot of tops too. Who cares. This might make me come across as a liberal, but I really have little respect for men in this world who get lucky with money and then go "play" with it. The bottom line is, the guy got lucky. He was at the right place, at the right time, in the right bubble, living in the right country and he scored big. He has really done nothing since. I'm not saying Mark Cuban is evil or a terrible person. I'm simply saying I won't spend more then a second thinking about the guy. There really is nothing there. And that's unfortunate.
Quote from Maverick74:
These things are not mutually exclusive. In other words, spending a lot of money does not guarantee success because the organizations can still be run poorly. But if I had to pick between Beane and Cuban, I would take Beane walking away.
As far as selling at the top, sure, that was a smart move. I've sold a lot of tops too. Who cares. This might make me come across as a liberal, but I really have little respect for men in this world who get lucky with money and then go "play" with it. The bottom line is, the guy got lucky. He was at the right place, at the right time, in the right bubble, living in the right country and he scored big. He has really done nothing since. I'm not saying Mark Cuban is evil or a terrible person. I'm simply saying I won't spend more then a second thinking about the guy. There really is nothing there. And that's unfortunate.
Quote from denner:
I guess I still fail to comprehend what differentiates Mark Cuban from any and all hedge fund managers, traders, investment bankers, etc...It sort of sounds as though you resent any and all people who acquire their wealth thru asset inflation?
I don't disagree to be honest as I've written oftentimes on here about how I lament our transition from an economy that produces "things" into an economy that simply trades pieces of paper back in forth in a greater fool type of game. BUT, be that as it may, almost all mega-wealth nowadays is generated this way. After all, the wage earner is taxed to the hilt and has no way to leverage that wealth...
Now, back to a more pertinent question. If you were a Cubs fan, would you rather have Tom Ricketts and family in the ownership position or Mark Cuban?
Quote from Maverick74:
These things are not mutually exclusive. In other words, spending a lot of money does not guarantee success because the organizations can still be run poorly. But if I had to pick between Beane and Cuban, I would take Beane walking away.
As far as selling at the top, sure, that was a smart move. I've sold a lot of tops too. Who cares. This might make me come across as a liberal, but I really have little respect for men in this world who get lucky with money and then go "play" with it. The bottom line is, the guy got lucky. He was at the right place, at the right time, in the right bubble, living in the right country and he scored big. He has really done nothing since. I'm not saying Mark Cuban is evil or a terrible person. I'm simply saying I won't spend more then a second thinking about the guy. There really is nothing there. And that's unfortunate.
Quote from Max E. Pad:
I think that Cuban would have been successful regasrdless of whether or not he sold that company during the tech bubble, I mean i think he would have made himself a multimillionaire, I think that anyone who works their ass off their entire life can make themselves into a multi millionaire.
But i do believe that you have to be in the right place at the right time to make yourself a billionaire in the way cuban did. There are lots of guys out there who have made themselves into billionaires, who still would have been succesful, and would have been multi millionaires, but needed the extra push that a bubble creates to get themselves into billionaire area.
So in a sense, he was lucky to be able to sell his dogshit company at the right place at the right time, and sell it for a thousand times what it was worth, but he probably would have been a multi millionaire regardless of whether or not he had the bubble helping him.
Quote from denner:
I guess I still fail to comprehend what differentiates Mark Cuban from any and all hedge fund managers, traders, investment bankers, etc...It sort of sounds as though you resent any and all people who acquire their wealth thru asset inflation?
I don't disagree to be honest as I've written oftentimes on here about how I lament our transition from an economy that produces "things" into an economy that simply trades pieces of paper back in forth in a greater fool type of game. BUT, be that as it may, almost all mega-wealth nowadays is generated this way. After all, the wage earner is taxed to the hilt and has no way to leverage that wealth...
Now, back to a more pertinent question. If you were a Cubs fan, would you rather have Tom Ricketts and family in the ownership position or Mark Cuban?
Quote from Max E. Pad:
I think that Cuban would have been successful regasrdless of whether or not he sold that company during the tech bubble, I mean i think he would have made himself a multimillionaire, I think that anyone who works their ass off their entire life can make themselves into a multi millionaire.
But i do believe that you have to be in the right place at the right time to make yourself a billionaire in the way cuban did. There are lots of guys out there who have made themselves into billionaires, who still would have been succesful, and would have been multi millionaires, but needed the extra push that a bubble creates to get themselves into billionaire area.
So in a sense, he was lucky to be able to sell his dogshit company at the right place at the right time, and sell it for a thousand times what it was worth, but he probably would have been a multi millionaire regardless of whether or not he had the bubble helping him.