Quote from Maverick74:
I have some very bad news to report here. I, however, stand by this statement and have more then enough trading sheets to back me up counting 100's, possibly thousands of traders.
The only way you can be profitable over the long run trading options is if you can predict volatility or price better then 95% of the other market participants. End of story. There is no getting around this. This is a non debatable fact. Anyone that tells you that you can just trade condors or calendars and make money should be reported directly to the SEC.
I know you don't want to hear this. Nobody does. It's kind of like telling an average slop that he will never marry a supermodel, but I think I have been in this business long enough and around enough traders to not only make this statement, but back it up with cold hard numbers.
Now, there is nothing inherently wrong with trading condors or calendars. It's just that both of those trades happen to be volatility trades. If you predict volatility correctly, they will make you money. If you don't, they will not. It's that simple. There are some very very bright people in this business that spend tens of millions of dollars and hire 100's of quants to predict volatility for them and they have a very tough time making money. But wait, some newbie with no option knowledge in the world is going to just slap on some volatility trades and consistently make money? I mean think about that for a second. Just try to use some common sense here.
...
I will say it again, the only way you will make money trading options is to be able to predict either direction or volatility better then 95% of all the traders out there. There is no way to get around this mathematically. Sure, due to the limited data sample many of you have, you will string together a few positive months. But in the end, you are playing with a negative expectancy. Good luck.