Ninja is ok if you don't need a lot of customization
you can customize it any way you want. No limits.
Ninja is ok if you don't need a lot of customization
You're asking a lot - I use several different software environments.
Ninjatrader is terrible with hundreds of symbols - it can only handle a few hundred before it crashes. Restarting it extends the limits again (for a while) but then crashes again. Performance is slow when you have such large amounts too (i.e. multiple seconds between clicks).
In summary, Ninjatrader: Good for small symbol numbers, not good for thousands.
One worth looking at - it seems to have got more polished in recent months. Quantconnect's LEAN environment. It's based on C# but also incorporates Python and appears to be feature rich. Their Quantconnect environment allows you to use their data and "cloud backtesting" but the LEAN open source allows you to compile locally and do everything locally with no Quantconnect involvement. Charting was limited when I tried it several months ago though.
correct. If you need this large amount of charts, it will not work. I am not aware of any software that can handle it.
...
Ninjatrader can't handle thousands of securities at all - it crashes (I forget the limit) but made it useless for portfolio backtesting of stocks...
you can customize it any way you want. No limits.
Agree on this one. But at the same time not so hard. Establish multiple connections and this give you option to pick and choose which broker to use.You are limited by the way they have designed their software. For example you can't easily replace the broker layer.
I have the life-time multi-broker license of NinjaTrader. But the more I use it, the less I like it.
I've always wondered if that had to do with the way NT processes tick data, and how it trashes spinny drives.
Has anyone tried this on a pure SSD system with NT8?
I've always wondered if that had to do with the way NT processes tick data, and how it trashes spinny drives.
Has anyone tried this on a pure SSD system with NT8?