Thanks! I think we need to help each other to improve out trading. One way to learn is to follow a good mentor to trade real time. Unfortunately there is too many not so good people that like to take our time & money. I am doing my share to contribute here.
By the way one post by Dottom said about TI thread the best:
http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&threadid=66460&perpage=6&pagenumber=87
Thoughts:
- "Just take the damn trial" argument is total BS because that is the crux of any advertising attempt. One week proves nothing. Ever heard of tout sports betting services that give away free trials, money-back guarantees, etc. all the time. They don't care. They just have to win some small % of the time and the people who happened to be on the free trial will be coming back for more.
- For the kind of size being advertised, there are many other ways to show proof than just audited trading statements. Heck, the monthly commission fee summary would at least give an indication of # of RT's without showing any other dollar amounts.
- If the goal is to get more ppl in the room, any kind of "proof" would be the ultimate advertising. The fact that this is being advertised on ET means they want more subscribers. If they could, they would, it's that simple. Heck, even showing one week or one month's worth of "proof" would pull in more subscribers (who cares about showing size or profitability over a year).
- There was a post a while back that one possible reason for wanting more subscribers (after all, why would he run a chat room if he's pulling down $146k per day), is because he's front-running. The problem with this argument is that if he was truly front-running, he'd open up the chat room for FREE. Then he'd have thousands of subscribers to run in front of...
- The argument that ET members should go to the chat room to ask questions conveniently disregards the fact that Franz came here.
- Seeing the same market depth on sim vs. real proves nothing. Put both side-by-side you'll see the same market depth. What about the scratched off contract header?
- The "challenge" will prove nothing and is worthless. Just drop it.
- Audited statements aren't necessary. Find any trusted third party in the trading business and their endorsement is worth more than the actual statement itself. Someone trading this kind of size should have many friends in the trading business.
- Franz should have known with his experience on other message boards, being in the industry for 19-years, attending seminars, traders expos, magazine interviews, and being in the chat room/tout/system selling business to expect due dilligence questions.
- Leave all insults out of this. Just the facts, please.
- Every other legit chat room, guru, even system seller has always been willing to show some kind of "proof".
- #1 motto in sales: "Where there is mystery there is margin."
- My personal belief: Franz trades smaller size than he claims, but he does trade. He shows the occasional statement (when he didn't have to keep doubling down b/c he probably doesn't to the tune of thousands of contracts as claimed). He can show these statements because he does trade some moderate size. Since he trades moderate size, the chat room and whatever he gets from TI is a significant enough amount of income that it's worth his time to bother with all that comes with this business. Since he doesn't trade the actual size that he claims, he will refuse to show any "proof" other than one day statements here and there that happen to reflect 1) the moderate size he actually traded (i.e. we only needed to trade 25-contracts today because we didn't have to double down); 2) when they coincide with the calls in the chat room that day. Whether he is long-term profitable or not I will not speculate.