Quote from Corey:
Great quote from Wilmott forum's on Correlation vs Cointegration:
That is a great quote.
I know that correlation is not the same as cointegration, I also know that you can have cointegration without correlation...what I don't understand is how you can have correlation without co-integration. Of course a stock is perfectly correlated to itself, but not co-integrated (because the returns would never deviate obviously), but what I mean is for practical purposes - if, say, an ETF is 97% correlated with one of it's component stocks, how can it not be cointegrated? Somebody help me out here!