Any day now is today, Trumpers. Trump Indicted

The people who are voting in the primaries will make that decision.

Why do you hate democracy?

Nikki Haley has already dropped out of the race , and yet this happen.....
and I was told I would be so tired of winning.:banghead:.


'Major red flag': Trump struggles in Georgia counties where primary voters choose Haley

73ce75fc03d1ab9676a1df5438c3d36d30bd9f5e5662de8842d1cd612cb1e3fb.jpg


Georgia's primary election Tuesday secured for President Joe Biden enough delegates to win the Democratic nomination but showed signs of trouble ahead for former President Donald Trump, experts said.

Trump easily secured the state with 84.3 of the vote as of 10 p.m. but he was barely above 50 percent in the Atlanta-area Fulton and DeKalb counties, according to New York Times projections.

The rest of those votes went to former South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley — even though she's already dropped out of the Republican presidential race. As of 10 p.m. she had secured 45 percent of the vote in Dekalb County and 39 percent in Fulton County, according to the new York Times.

"This is BIG!" wrote GOP political consultant and Lincoln Project co-founder Mike Madrid on X. "Trump's problems in the suburbs continue in Georgia."

Legal and political commentator Bradley Moss concurred.

"In a race where Haley already dropped out," he wrote. "That’s a major red flag for Trump."
 
Last edited:
Nikki Haley has already dropped out of the race , and yet this happen.....
and I was told I would be so tired of winning.:banghead:.


'Major red flag': Trump struggles in Georgia counties where primary voters choose Haley

73ce75fc03d1ab9676a1df5438c3d36d30bd9f5e5662de8842d1cd612cb1e3fb.jpg


Georgia's primary election Tuesday secured for President Joe Biden enough delegates to win the Democratic nomination but showed signs of trouble ahead for former President Donald Trump, experts said.

Trump easily secured the state with 84.3 of the vote as of 10 p.m. but he was barely above 50 percent in the Atlanta-area Fulton and DeKalb counties, according to New York Times projections.

The rest of those votes went to former South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley — even though she's already dropped out of the Republican presidential race. As of 10 p.m. she had secured 45 percent of the vote in Dekalb County and 39 percent in Fulton County, according to the new York Times.

"This is BIG!" wrote GOP political consultant and Lincoln Project co-founder Mike Madrid on X. "Trump's problems in the suburbs continue in Georgia."

Legal and political commentator Bradley Moss concurred.

"In a race where Haley already dropped out," he wrote. "That’s a major red flag for Trump."

only redneck morons who have never been at school are still going to vote for stinky.
 
only redneck morons who have never been at school are still going to vote for stinky.

Don't forget another part of his voting base...

How Trump Brought Nazis Into Republican Politics


https://nymag.com/intelligencer/art...kenosha-charlottesville-very-fine-people.html

Trump did more than just invite supporters to a rally. He also repeatedly shared a slickly produced video, titled “The Plot to Steal America,” that warned ominously of a Chinese communist scheme involving Biden, the Democrats, and the news media, and called for Trump supporters to mobilize.

“We know that our rights don’t come from the government, but from God,” declared the narrator, an Ohio jewelry buyer formerly employed by the pro-Trump propaganda outlet the Epoch Times. “And we will fight to the death to protect those rights.” In a tweet the day after Christmas, Trump suggested that if the Democrats were in his position, the “Rigged & Stolen” presidential election would be considered “an act of war, and fight to the death.”

https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2021/02/trump-stochastic-terrorism-us-capitol-mob-incitement/


The above is the man who incited violence and incited the Insurrection of Democracy and the U.S. Constitution on January 6th, 2021.

Trump is the greater evil to Americans.

wrbtrader
 
Last edited:
He has requested immunity as these "cases" are fixed. I don't think he requested immunity on the documents "case" though. Pay attention.


Explain this to us....

'This is weird': Trump's new argument in hush money case baffles legal expert

Former President Donald Trump has filed a motion in his hush money case that one legal expert is calling "weird."

Trump's Monday filing in New York City criminal court — where he stands accused of falsifying business records to pay off Stormy Daniels ahead of the 2016 presidential election — shows he plans to present an advice-of-counsel defense, court records show.

"Trump's legal argument is his intent can never meet the requisite criminal threshold by virtue of the fact that lawyers were involved," explained attorney Bradley Moss, dubbing it an, "'I gave orders, I assume the lawyers do everything lawfully, I am now covered'" argument.

In the filing, Trump's attorneys Susan Necheles and Todd Blanche alert Judge Juan Merchan that their client indeed lacked intent because his lawyers were involved in the exchanges at the heart of Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg's case.

But they also admit that their advice-of-counsel defense — which typically argues that a defendant was misled by legal advice — will not run the normal course in court.

"At the outset, we emphasize that there is a marked difference between the commonly referred to 'advice-of-counsel' defense; and the defense that President Trump expects to raise at trial," the attorneys write.

"While President Trump intends to elicit evidence concerning the presence, involvement and advice of lawyers in relevant events giving rise to the charges in the Indictment, he does not intend to assert a formal advice-of-counsel defense."

Such a defense would require Trump to prove he told his lawyers everything, sought and received advice that his actions were legal, and relied on their advice "in good faith," the lawyers write.

Because this will not be a formal defense, the attorneys argue they are allowed to skip the requirement that they give prosecutors the basic details.
 
This is the DOJ messing up
They didn't allow any time for court maneuvering or delays......They were to greedy and wanted the trial all to happen in 2024...These cases should have been brought in 2022 or 2023
They waited until 2024 because the purpose was not to litigate the case but to tie up Trump from campaigning.and break his bank.

They didn't realize that a busy Trump keeps him off of social media where he pisses everyone off.....He is to busy to tweet at 3am....and it might be the reason he wins....They forced Trump into a basement strategy

They did not count on the huge sympathy votes. Nobody wants to see anyone being mistreated like they have done to President Donald Trump. He has a huge number of sympathy votes because of it. Imagine if you were similarly wrong accused and being persecuted by the government, how would you feel? Indignant and angry at those persecuting you. Ordinary Americans see that happening to President Donald Trump and hate it!
 
Explain this to us....

'This is weird': Trump's new argument in hush money case baffles legal expert

Former President Donald Trump has filed a motion in his hush money case that one legal expert is calling "weird."

Trump's Monday filing in New York City criminal court — where he stands accused of falsifying business records to pay off Stormy Daniels ahead of the 2016 presidential election — shows he plans to present an advice-of-counsel defense, court records show.

"Trump's legal argument is his intent can never meet the requisite criminal threshold by virtue of the fact that lawyers were involved," explained attorney Bradley Moss, dubbing it an, "'I gave orders, I assume the lawyers do everything lawfully, I am now covered'" argument.

In the filing, Trump's attorneys Susan Necheles and Todd Blanche alert Judge Juan Merchan that their client indeed lacked intent because his lawyers were involved in the exchanges at the heart of Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg's case.

But they also admit that their advice-of-counsel defense — which typically argues that a defendant was misled by legal advice — will not run the normal course in court.

"At the outset, we emphasize that there is a marked difference between the commonly referred to 'advice-of-counsel' defense; and the defense that President Trump expects to raise at trial," the attorneys write.

"While President Trump intends to elicit evidence concerning the presence, involvement and advice of lawyers in relevant events giving rise to the charges in the Indictment, he does not intend to assert a formal advice-of-counsel defense."

Such a defense would require Trump to prove he told his lawyers everything, sought and received advice that his actions were legal, and relied on their advice "in good faith," the lawyers write.

Because this will not be a formal defense, the attorneys argue they are allowed to skip the requirement that they give prosecutors the basic details.
It's a good argument. ----all avenues need to be worked to stop this braggadocio kangaron court from proceeding.
 
Back
Top