Any day now is today, Trumpers. Trump Indicted

smallfil said:
What makes the charge idiotic is President Donald Trump had no way to overturn the results. Now, if he ordered the National Guard to seize the ballots, that would have been a basis for charging him. He did no such thing or even interfered in the counting of the ballots. Asking to investigate possible election fraud is not against the law. A number of US citizens tried to challenge it in US courts but, when the US courts turn a blind eye to fraud, there is not much you can do about it.
More...

Pressuring election officials to lie and invalidate election results is against the law -- in every f@cking state and federally.
 
Atlantic said:
https://www.yahoo.com/news/ex-prosecutor-fani-willis-strategy-130306859.html

Ex-prosecutor: Fani Willis’ strategy pays off as indicted fake electors “point the finger” at Trump
More...
530583e79e4fc7f75855995d511e185c.jpg
 
smallfil said:
What makes the charge idiotic is President Donald Trump had no way to overturn the results. Now, if he ordered the National Guard to seize the ballots, that would have been a basis for charging him. He did no such thing or even interfered in the counting of the ballots. Asking to investigate possible election fraud is not against the law. A number of US citizens tried to challenge it in US courts but, when the US courts turn a blind eye to fraud, there is not much you can do about it.
More...
Quite so----even if he was found to be lying about his belief that the election was stolen, there is no crime in that. He can still challenge the election and exhaust all avenues including asking government officials to "find" votes. An aside, Mark Meadows has moved to have his trial in Federal Court and he may eventually be successful. That should spell doom for Willis and her fanny.
 
smallfil said:
What makes the charge idiotic is President Donald Trump had no way to overturn the results. Now, if he ordered the National Guard to seize the ballots, that would have been a basis for charging him. He did no such thing or even interfered in the counting of the ballots. Asking to investigate possible election fraud is not against the law. A number of US citizens tried to challenge it in US courts but, when the US courts turn a blind eye to fraud, there is not much you can do about it.
More...
Yes and furthermore Trump did not lie and pressure government officials to create new votes.
 
Buy1Sell2 said:
Quite so----even if he was found to be lying about his belief that the election was stolen, there is no crime in that. He can still challenge the election and exhaust all avenues including asking government officials to "find" votes. An aside, Mark Meadows has moved to have his trial in Federal Court and he may eventually be successful. That should spell doom for Willis and her fanny.
More...
There would be a crime if Trump believed he did lose and did all these things...That is Jacks case

It seems for the DOJ to make this case they first need to prove the there was no election interference....in every state
 
Mercor said:
There would be a crime if Trump believed he did lose and did all these things...That is Jacks case

It seems for the DOJ to make this case they first need to prove the there was no election interference....in every state
More...

It has already been proven in court over 50 times that there was no meaning election interference or fraud in any state during the 2020 election.

The only meaningful attempted election interference and fraud in the 2020 election come from Trump and his cronies— which is why the are being indicted for attempting to undermine our democracy.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top