Quote from Lewcifer:
That's just a circular definition... "outside of accepted norms." I'm sure it is not outside of Ed Seykota's accepted norms, nor that of his "tribe" followers. That begs the question... should Ed live by the standards of the person who judged him, or his own standards?
As for multiple divorces, how many divorces make a person a bad trader? I'm sure you know the divorce rate in the USA is greater than 50%, and that second marriages have an even higher divorce rate. Therefore, if someone's going to judge the man based on "multiple divorces" -- I suggest they first study their facts.
As you can gather, I find people who render ad-hominem attacks on the character of others to be quite flawed themselves (in reference to the original attacker).
Quote from fhl:
I wonder how you know that Ed never does anything outside of his accepted norms. Have you ever done anything you know to be wrong?
Whether we view someone on a "compartmentalized" basis, as was frequently talked about during the Clinton administration, seems almost always to depend on the type of behavior that is being compartmentalized. I found that the same people who thought sex was not to be considered when talking about whether someone was fit for a job would generally have a fit if the subject was race or gender. I have a feeling that if the accusations against Ed were of some other nature than sex, many would change their tune quite rapidly about whether it was relevant or not.
Quote from michael c:
Seykota lives a Polygamous, Swinger Type Lifestyle and is proud of it. It certainly is not the stuff of heroes. More like losers.
MC