Anti-Semitism is a LIE!

[TraderZones]

Quote from TM_Direct:

Exodus 21
1 "These are the laws you are to set before them:

Hebrew Servants
2 "If you buy a Hebrew servant, he is to serve you for six years. But in the seventh year, he shall go free, without paying anything. 3 If he comes alone, he is to go free alone; but if he has a wife when he comes, she is to go with him. 4 If his master gives him a wife and she bears him sons or daughters, the woman and her children shall belong to her master, and only the man shall go free.
5 "But if the servant declares, 'I love my master and my wife and children and do not want to go free,' 6 then his master must take him before the judges. [a] He shall take him to the door or the doorpost and pierce his ear with an awl. Then he will be his servant for life.

7 "If a man sells his daughter as a servant, she is not to go free as menservants do. 8 If she does not please the master who has selected her for himself, he must let her be redeemed. He has no right to sell her to foreigners, because he has broken faith with her. 9 If he selects her for his son, he must grant her the rights of a daughter. 10 If he marries another woman, he must not deprive the first one of her food, clothing and marital rights. 11 If he does not provide her with these three things, she is to go free, without any payment of money.



HERE'S MY FAVORITE!!!!


20 "If a man beats his male or female slave with a rod and the slave dies as a direct result, he must be punished, 21 but he is not to be punished if the slave gets up after a day or two, since the slave is his property.


lmao.....wAS THIS THE HAND OF GOD SPEAKING OR SLAVE MASTER FROM GEORGIA!!?????

ROFTLMAO - It is a good thing if YOU lived and were wealthy back then, you would have NEVER owned slaves, because you are so CLEVR and GUD and SMARTE.

Yea, right.

It is nice that a mortal flesh speck in 2008 knows how the cosmos works, that he can use historical revisionism to tell what God SHOULD have done in TM world.

Brought to you from the person who knew that "Barnabas" instead of Barabbas" was the one substituted for Christ and that "Ponius Pilot" instead of "Pontius Pilate"was the judge over Christ's Roman judgment (it hurts to even read your posts).

But you are the person who apparently has enough Biblical and Purpose and God understanding, that you can tell God what He should be like and how He should run things.

This was already covered in Bruce Almighty.

 

[TM_Direct]

Quote from TraderZones:

ROFTLMAO - It is a good thing if YOU lived and were wealthy back then, you would have NEVER owned slaves, because you are so CLEVR and GUD and SMARTE.

Yea, right.

It is nice that a mortal flesh speck in 2008 knows how the cosmos works, that he can use historical revisionism to tell what God SHOULD have done in TM world.

Brought to you from the person who knew that "Barnabas" instead of Barabbas" was the one substituted for Christ and that "Ponius Pilot" instead of "Pontius Pilate"was the judge over Christ's Roman judgment (it hurts to even read your posts).

But you are the person who apparently has enough Biblical and Purpose and God understanding, that you can tell God what He should be like and how He should run things.

This was already covered in Bruce Almighty.

Thank you for proving my point you dumb ass twit!!!!

I was responding to antoher poster who was saying when , where and what the gospel was......I used his logic to show it is flawed thinking....read before you spew shit...and as i said before...Im so SORRY i had a typo spelling ...Oh my God! I will go to confession....BTW..Bruce Almighty??? LOL...fag. waht's next: you will quote OH GOD????

 

[TraderZones]

Quote from TM_Direct:

Thank you for proving my point you dumb ass twit!!!!

Proving your point? Does it make you feel good when you stick out your tongue? Because the point was that you and logic are antonyms.[/b]

I was responding to antoher poster who was saying when , where and what the gospel was......I used his logic to show it is flawed thinking...

That was a "response"? You wield logic like a toddler wields a gun. I read your posts. A more accurate statement would be you MISused his logic and demonstrated your own inability to think.

read before you spew shit...and as i said before...Im so SORRY i had a typo spelling ...Oh my God! I will go to confession....BTW..Bruce Almighty??? LOL...fag. waht's next: you will quote OH GOD????

Your language pretty much paints you as pathetic, at best. Try getting your G.E.D. 3 or 4 hard years of work might get you close.

In the meantime I can say it is a waste of time having a mental duel with an unarmed person. Fortunately, the IGNORE function is available to shut out serious time-wasters as yourself. Sayanora

 

[TM_Direct]

what's the matter fag boy??? you have no arguments unless there is a typo???? you couldn't ignore me if you tried. funny you mention GED...you still in High School????

 

[TM_Direct]

Quote from Mom0/pH0x:

no, no one said that jew's didn't do this, but that early christians DID, you are making a non sequitur here... whether or not jews did this is beside the point that christians did do it... the authenticity or lack thereof regarding the gospels, and particularly that of john is what is being indicted here, not judaism... you are trying to remove the attention from the shortcomings of the gospels and the fact that they were written roughly 3 centuries after jesus was dead, and the fact that noone even knows which 'john' supposedly wrote it by making a disanalagous comparison to judaism....

nice strawman but no cigar...

Let me get this strait...what your basically is saying is that " we don't know who wrote our writings but we also don't know who wrote yours"?? so that makes your argument better???? And what proof do youhave that early Christians worte to suit their own needs? You have no proof...you only have theory based upon modern men reviewing books written 2000 years ago.

question though. who wrote exodus? when ? who? ( let me guess, your going to run to google)

 

[TM_Direct]

Quote from Mom0/pH0x:

the so called 'gospels' were written roughly a couple of centuries after the death of jesus, they were also written by people who adopted christianity who had serious enmity against jews for not adopting christianity, christianity was struggling with judaism for legitimacy at this point, so all writings should be filtered through that logic...

these are your words corect? Christains take the Gospel seriousy, yet you say

" the 'gospels' were nothing more than an oral tradition for at least a century after the crucifixion supposedly occurred "

Bsacially you just trashed our gospels and questioned whether the crucifixion even occurred...


Now. what would happen if i questioned the enslavement of the hebrews? the holocaust?.passover ? ..then im anti semetic right???

There are a lot of things about history we just don't know we all agree on that.

 

[TM_Direct]

Quote from Mom0/pH0x:

well with the enslavement of the hebrews, you could question it, but there's an awful lot both archeological evidence as well as text to refute that question... it's pretty well validated... but admittedly there is some room for speculation i'll give you that...

the holocaust was in RECENT history, there are several eye witnesses and even survivors of it still living, so yeah, if you made some absurd denial about that, i could only suspect antisemitism, because no fathomable leap of logic would lead one to the conclusion that the holocaust didn't occur, there is evidence, eye witness accounts, survivors, and even video, and records of those disposed of... to try to even make that analogy to one anonymous text claiming ot be an eye witness account of an event that occured 300 years before it's authorship is pretty stupid... but hey, i guess that's what people do when they are desperate to win arguments...

actually, there were many many more eye witness accounts,,, there are many more books and authors...the bible contains a select few so ...you are wrong about one eye witness 300 years later....try again. do some more google research for your next argument

 

[JWS11]

Mom0/Ph0x:

You just quote a bunch of dubious sources and open forums like Wikipedia claiming that various writers doubt the validity of the Gospels, etc. In doing so, you conveniently ommit the plain fact that thousands of religious scholars for centuries (by far the vast majority of those who studied the subject) have analyzed and validated the authenticity of those works. Not to mention their spiritual content that has inspired millions. OK, free speech is your right if you live here in the US or a similarly free society.

Christianity, like all major religions, has been under attack since the beginning, two thousand years ago. During all this time, there have been plenty of individuals doubting it, like you are doing here on ET. Yet, at the same time, billions of people have stood by the Christian sources and teachings, and still do. Deal with that. And when you realize that these folks don't care about what you say, maybe you'll see that insulting the religious beliefs of others is a dirty, despicable, pointless thing to do.
What are your own beliefs and ethnic/religious background Mom0/Ph0x? Put them up and see if others want to take a stab at denouncing them. How would that feel? Are you Jewish? Doubt it, most Jews I know are decent people and you don't look like one to me. Muslim extremist? Red-hot atheist? Were you abused in some way, perhaps at an early age? I'm sorry about that but that's not an excuse to insult others either. So, what's it, man? How do we reach you? Or you don't want to be reached, just want to have the opportunity to throw stones at other people's houses in cowardly anonymity?

 

[stu]

JWS11,

Christians say lots of things that turn out not to be true.
Why should I believe you when Mom0/pH0x has cited scholarly references which can be checked and validated, whilst you only resort to no more than over defensive rhetoric laced with insult?

 

[JWS11]

Quote from stu:

JWS11,

Christians say lots of things that turn out not to be true.

Some Christians are saying things that are not true, perhaps as many as non-Christians do, for sure, right? What does this have to do with anything? Many Christians tell the truth too, and many non-Christians do also. What's your point?

I am not asking you to believe me, I don't need to convince you of anything. Believe what you will. Mom0 put up a few names of non-believers as if that proves something. Meanwhile you can go to any bookstore and find thousands of titles that contradict what he's saying. Do it or don't do it, I don't care. What is his main point? That Christianity is not a true religion? How can anyone with half a brain approach this type of question "objectively?"

It is clear to me that that's not what he's trying to do - but to insult and shock all those who respect it as their religion. That's unacceptable to me and others on ET - if he insults us we'll point it out to him and encourage him to change course.

Therefore, what I'm taking issue with is his approach, which, judging from past experience, is similar to yours. It can be summarized as "Tell me what you believe in and I will throw rocks at it and enjoy your suffering." Is that decent? Can it be fruitful?
What do you believe in, stu? Anything?