Well that's ugly. Want to share the rules you coded so they can rebut? Or is that re-butt?
This was my basic methodology... http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&postid=1078242#post1078242 If you peruse the thread after that point there are more details. You can also marvel at the A Team's feeble and pathetic obfuscation attempts.Quote from hypostomus:
Well that's ugly. Want to share the rules you coded so they can rebut? Or is that re-butt?
Hi Spydy... my backtests were done correctly. And anyone who tests the same things will come to the same conclusion (see the link at my last post and read forward for more specifics than I care to repeat here). But the bottom line is I used Jack's own definition as a starting point:Quote from Spydertrader:
Perhaps, someone could clarify the conclusions of Trader666's hypothesis for me. (Assuming all Trader666's backtest claims arrived from valid tests), should one assume that since she could not backtest profitably, the system (in this particular case 'rockets'), therefor, does not work in the present or cannot work in the future?
- Spydertrader
Quote from Cheese:
Do the few genuine members on this thread know that you are debating with a number of your aliases on this thread?
![]()

