Anti-Jack Trading

Status
Not open for further replies.
Quote from oddiduro:

A direct challege.

This will be met with silence of course.

I have concluded that many of these posts are driven by some sort of deep seated insecurities on the part of some these folks.

But we will see.
Of course you're wrong yet again. And speaking of direct challenges, you fail to mention Jack's repeated evasions of my real-time trading contest challenges. Just think of how easy it would be to settle it all right here, on ET.

Or is Jack afraid because in the past he finished dead last out of 14 participants in a trading contest, with -23.8%? Take a look...
 
Quote from dougcs:

Aah, is it you or is it me, I'm getting very confused with who is who in this thread.

I am a fan of the genus, Hypostumus though I prefer Ancistrus species as they don't damage the leaves as much as H. plecostumus.

Also, I prefer trading the way it says on the back of the KooLAid box.

DS
Sorry for flying off the handle like that...

I thought you might be comparing Plecos, and other scum-sucking bottom feeding types, with Mr Hypo.

And that would do serious damage to the reputations of those fine Ichthys. :D
 
One of the guiding priniples of the B-Team is that trading is approximately linear. We do not believe that you can make a system out of multiple rules which individually test out with negative expectancy. In other words, we don't believe in synergy. We've all been married. And worked in large corporations. Or married to people we met at large corporations.
 
Quote from Choad:

Sorry for flying off the handle like that...

I thought you might be comparing Plecos, and other scum-sucking bottom feeding types, with Mr Hypo.

And that would do serious damage to the reputations of those fine Ichthys. :D

I like those bottom dwellers of both genus and I like the looks of Hypo's trades but wish he would explain them with the clarity Jack uses in his prose.

DS
:)
 
Quote from hypostomus:

One of the guiding priniples of the B-Team is that trading is approximately linear. We do not believe that you can make a system out of multiple rules which individually test out with negative expectancy. In other words, we don't believe in synergy. We've all been married. And worked in large corporations. Or married to people we met at large corporations.

You just dont understand a great set up with a real edge when you see it.
 
Quote from Spydertradar:

You just dont understand a great set up with a real edge when you see it.
If you have any sense at all, you don't.

Only NLP drugged dopes understand their guru's real edge, even without looking at it.
 
Doug, please give Jack my warmest regards the next time you see him. I am thinking of vacationing in Tucson just to attend his IBD meeting. And I sent your way a young lady who needs help trading the Fed ala Jack. She posted in Trading.
 
I am he as you are he as you are me and we are all together.

See how they run like pigs from a gun see how they fly

I'm crying

Sitting on a cornflake waiting for the van to come

I am the eggman they are the eggmen

I am the walrus

Boo Boo Ba Boolean
 
Quote from Trader666:

Thanks for yourRED HERRINGoffer but your attempt to obfuscate the real issue is puny and laughable. You're trying to hide a very important point: that the highly acclaimed 0 to 7 shift of the "P,V Boolean relation" is a bunch of Ballyhoo. Adding new conditions now, in hindsight, won't negate or disprove that.

I was simply testing what's in "Catch Up with Tomorrow’s Paper Today" (attached). Jack has waxed so eloquently about the "P,V Boolean relation" and the "0 to 7" turn that one would think he's discovered relativity. So I measured the impact of the 0 to 7 shift IN ISOLATION. And I made that clear when I posted the first equity curve. So please spare us the red herrings.

http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&postid=1115189#post1115189
Jack picked up the P/V stuff from a market letter out of the late 1960's. AFAIK nobody ever made any money with it but it looked so weird that it became the cornerstone of Jack's "system", whatever that means.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top