Anti-Crime Activist Shot Dead Following Thanksgiving Dinner

Anti-Crime Activist Shot Dead Following Thanksgiving Dinner

police-crime-tape-Shreveport-PD-640x480.jpg

SPD/File

by AWR HAWKINS26 Nov 2017832

Anti-crime activist Shuri Henry was killed around 11 pm Thursday after driving back to her own home following Thanksgiving Dinner.
Henry was 40 years old.

According to NJ.com, Henry’s “young nephew” was riding with her when they pulled up to her home in Newark. She and her nephew were then allegedly targeted by armed carjackers. Henry was shot and left for dead as the carjackers took her vehicle and fled the scene. Her nephew was not harmed.

Henry’s neighbor, Devon Wright, said he heard the sound of the of the gunshot and ran outside in time to see “two people in her car, driving away with the lights off.”

Wright said, “At the time I thought she was the driver. I couldn’t see her where I was standing. A few minutes later all these police cars came screaming up. I came outside again to see what they were kneeling in front of. I saw her, face down, lifeless.”

Two adults and a minor were arrested Friday after police found them in Henry’s car.

Henry had scheduled an anti-crime rally for Nov. 30. District leader Lyndon Brown said the rally will go on as planned, suggesting that Henry’s murder highlights the need for the event.

New Jersey has some of the strictest gun control laws in the nation. It remains a “may issue” state for concealed carry, requiring applicants to show a “justifiable need” for a permit before being allowed to carry a gun for self-defense.
 
NO RACE MENTIONED IN THE ARTICLE = BLACK ON BLACK MURDER

Very sad. SMH.
Worst part is the three males could have just taken the car from her. There was no reason to kill her!
Keep holding rallies yet never confront the real issue. And the liberal media sweeps it under the rug because they can’t stir the race pot.
 
Last edited:
NO RACE MENTIONED IN THE ARTICLE = BLACK ON BLACK MURDER

Very sad. SMH.
Worst part is the three males could have just taken the car from her. There was no reason to kill her!
Keep holding rallies yet never confront the real issue. And the liberal media sweeps it under the rug because they can’t stir the race pot.

What's the real issue?
 
Carjacking is a federal crime however I could not easily findstats or maps.

Looking at the stats for NJ and assuming a continuing trend things have improved significantly. Doing an eyeball comparison with Texas and Nevada (most guns) there seems no great argument that concealed carry makes a difference?

https://www.ucrdatatool.gov/Search/Crime/State/RunCrimeStatebyState.cfm

Looking at murder rates by states, adjusted by population more guns looks bad, New York is remarkably low. District of Colombia of course is huge, why do people bang on about Chicago?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murder_in_the_United_States_by_state

"Gun advocates and the NRA are fearful of unseen evils, they are the cowards and they want everyone to cower with them. They want to sell you your own fear so you think you need a gun, they want you to be a coward. The NRA and the gun advocates have always know the price of everything and the value of nothing."

new jerset.PNG
 
Carjacking is a federal crime

View attachment 179863



More specifically, car jacking can be a federal crime if it meets certain criteria.

However, it also a state crime in all fifty states and is more likely to be prosecuted as a state crime.

So the data is spread around a bit. In addition, carjacking statistics at the state level would include carjacking by force that did not include the use of a firearm. I think the fed crime requires a firearm and kind of interstate aspect.
 
Car jacking is a daily event in Chicago, usually multiple time per day. Typically no one gets shot in the process, but occasionally someone gets killed. Most of these type crimes are black on black, with the young thugs preying on older black people. Then there are the hundreds of killing per year, and tens of thousands of violent attacks. Chances of a black person being the victim of a crime committed by another black man are astronomically higher than a black man getting unjustly shot by a cop. So where's all the focus? On the minuscule chance of an unjust shooting by the cop.:banghead: And leftist activists are walking around scratching their heads wondering what the problem is.
 
Anti-Crime Activist Shot Dead Following Thanksgiving Dinner

police-crime-tape-Shreveport-PD-640x480.jpg

SPD/File

by AWR HAWKINS26 Nov 2017832

Anti-crime activist Shuri Henry was killed around 11 pm Thursday after driving back to her own home following Thanksgiving Dinner.
Henry was 40 years old.

According to NJ.com, Henry’s “young nephew” was riding with her when they pulled up to her home in Newark. She and her nephew were then allegedly targeted by armed carjackers. Henry was shot and left for dead as the carjackers took her vehicle and fled the scene. Her nephew was not harmed.

Henry’s neighbor, Devon Wright, said he heard the sound of the of the gunshot and ran outside in time to see “two people in her car, driving away with the lights off.”

Wright said, “At the time I thought she was the driver. I couldn’t see her where I was standing. A few minutes later all these police cars came screaming up. I came outside again to see what they were kneeling in front of. I saw her, face down, lifeless.”

Two adults and a minor were arrested Friday after police found them in Henry’s car.

Henry had scheduled an anti-crime rally for Nov. 30. District leader Lyndon Brown said the rally will go on as planned, suggesting that Henry’s murder highlights the need for the event.

New Jersey has some of the strictest gun control laws in the nation. It remains a “may issue” state for concealed carry, requiring applicants to show a “justifiable need” for a permit before being allowed to carry a gun for self-defense.

It’s always pathetic when I see right wing tabloids run stories just to push their gun agenda.

It would be nice if the right wing tabloids focused on how these criminals were able to get a gun in the first place. I mean isn’t that really what’s wrong here?
 
It would be nice if the right wing tabloids focused on how these criminals were able to get a gun in the first place. I mean isn’t that really what’s wrong here?
What's wrong extends beyond just the ability to obtain the guns, it is also the willingness to use the gun. The Right defends the ability to obtain the gun in these situations and the Left blames the Right for the Gun used to kill another human. Who is to blame for the trigger being pulled? Why is this always ignored?

To give African Americans a free pass for using guns is in itself a form of racism. It is saying "I do not believe that these people have the decision making abilities to fight the urge to use tools of death that are easy to access". Would an absence of guns solve all of these street crimes? Wouldn't knives and other weapons take the place of these guns? Or do you believe that the evil begins and ends with the gun itself?

When someone crashes a car due to intoxication and kills a young mother do we blame Ford and Budweiser and give the person who decided to drive intoxicated a free pass?

This Utopian SJW mindset is not based on any data at all. It is naive and it is wrong.
 
What's wrong extends beyond just the ability to obtain the guns, it is also the willingness to use the gun. The Right defends the ability to obtain the gun in these situations and the Left blames the Right for the Gun used to kill another human. Who is to blame for the trigger being pulled? Why is this always ignored?

To give African Americans a free pass for using guns is in itself a form of racism. It is saying "I do not believe that these people have the decision making abilities to fight the urge to use tools of death that are easy to access". Would an absence of guns solve all of these street crimes? Wouldn't knives and other weapons take the place of these guns? Or do you believe that the evil begins and ends with the gun itself?

When someone crashes a car due to intoxication and kills a young mother do we blame Ford and Budweiser and give the person who decided to drive intoxicated a free pass?

This Utopian SJW mindset is not based on any data at all. It is naive and it is wrong.

People and establishments are sued regularly for letting intoxicated people leave their home or establishment who then get into an accident.

You want to come up with a better analogy next time. Or, perhaps there’s some “data” I missed.
 
People and establishments are sued regularly for letting intoxicated people leave their home or establishment who then get into an accident.

You want to come up with a better analogy next time. Or, perhaps there’s some “data” I missed.
So the person in this article is not wrong for wanting to steal a car and kill someone? It is the fault of whoever sold the gun to this person?

Let's start with that data point.
 
Back
Top