You make it sound like I've had this conclusion implanted on me by the liberal media (previous post) when in fact I arrived at it myself from observation. FWIW, I don't own a tv, I get most my of my news cont through google news.
http://time.com/4422723/putin-russia-hillary-clinton/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2016_Democratic_National_Committee_email_leak#cite_note-secretcia-15
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guccifer_2.0
![]()
![]()
No, I'm saying that the original goal post was that the Russians had not tried to influence the election in any shape or form whatsoever.
One point of disagreement. I don't think the Russians really cared who won, although you could make an argument either way. What the Russians really wanted was to create enough doubt about the legitimacy of the election as to cause people to question the results. On that they hit a grand slam and I'm sure they are laughing their asses off.I'm not sure that was the original goal post. I think it was more about the Wikileaks tie to the Russians, which, as far as I am aware, still has not been proven at all.
Additionally, I haven't seen any evidence whatsoever of any Trump collusion, any Trump campaign collusion, and proof whatsoever of anything out of the norm such as the NSA report showing there were phishing attempts that are consistent with a method Russian hackers have used in the past.
So I maintain, where is the proof? Of anything?
Do I think the Russians wanted Trump to win and didn't want Hillary? Sure. So did I. Does that mean I'm guilty of meddling by telling others I was voting for Trump?
One point of disagreement. I don't think the Russians really cared who won, although you could make an argument either way. What the Russians really wanted was to create enough doubt about the legitimacy of the election as to cause people to question the results. On that they hit a grand slam and I'm sure they are laughing their asses off.
I tend to think the Russians were only paying back for our intrusion into politics of the countries neighboring Russia.One point of disagreement. I don't think the Russians really cared who won, although you could make an argument either way. What the Russians really wanted was to create enough doubt about the legitimacy of the election as to cause people to question the results. On that they hit a grand slam and I'm sure they are laughing their asses off.
I tend to think the Russians were only paying back for our intrusion into politics of the countries neighboring Russia.
Agreed. That anyone in the US 'is appalled' by Russian political intrusion, makes a great subject for a comedy skit.Good point. No one ever talks about all the elections the US meddles in around the world.
http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-...ury-indicts-accused-nsa-leaker-reality-winner
oh, I forgot you guys already moved the goal post
We all know what the reference is too, the reference is that Russians hacked hillary and released the information, that is the narrative thats been going on for months and months and months.
The narrative, and the question is specifically targeted to the idea that Russians, with the involvement of Trump hacked into the DNC's emails and then released them on wikileaks at a point whereby it would damage hillary the most.
Thats the story the liberals are selling, thats the reaction your getting back from people. If you ever asked one of these people "Do russians try to meddle in our elections" the answer would be far different.
Its dishonest, and its a way of manipulating the conversation to lead people into believing in all kinds of nonsense.