Another rockhead from the south...

Quote from OPTIONAL777:

Nothing like another ET member who makes false claims...

Or how about a liberal that's trying his level best to pauperize the world with false claims, like your buddy algore...

Climategate: Gore falsifies the record

Andrew Bolt


Al Gore has studied the Climategate emails with his typically rigorous eye and dismissed them as mere piffle:

Q: How damaging to your argument was the disclosure of e-mails from the Climate Research Unit at East Anglia University?

AG: To paraphrase Shakespeare, it’s sound and fury signifying nothing. I haven’t read all the e-mails, but the most recent one is more than 10 years old. These private exchanges between these scientists do not in any way cause any question about the scientific consensus.

And in case you think that was a mere slip of the tongue:

Q: There is a sense in these e-mails, though, that data was hidden and hoarded, which is the opposite of the case you make [in your book] about having an open and fair debate.

AG: I think it’s been taken wildly out of context. The discussion you’re referring to was about two papers that two of these scientists felt shouldn’t be accepted as part of the IPCC report. Both of them, in fact, were included, referenced, and discussed. So an e-mail exchange more than 10 years ago including somebody’s opinion that a particular study isn’t any good is one thing, but the fact that the study ended up being included and discussed anyway is a more powerful comment on what the result of the scientific process really is.

In fact, thrice denied:

AG: These people are examining what they can or should do to deal with the P.R. dimensions of this, but where the scientific consensus is concerned, it’s completely unchanged. What we’re seeing is a set of changes worldwide that just make this discussion over 10-year-old e-mails kind of silly.

In fact, as Watts Up With That shows, one Climategate email was from just two months ago. The most recent was sent on November 12 - just a month ago. The emails which have Tom Wigley seeming (to me) to choke on the deceit are all from this year. Phil Jones’ infamous email urging other Climategate scientists to delete emails is from last year.

How closely did Gore read these emails? Did he actually read any at all? Was he lying or just terribly mistaken? What else has he got wrong?
 
Quote from OPTIONAL777:

Watching the way in which you respond is like watching a monkey fucking a football...

LOL, you like to watch monkeys fucking footballs?

What happened, you get tired of kiddie porn?
 
Al Gore is an ET member?

Who knew...

Quote from fhl:

Or how about a liberal that's trying his level best to pauperize the world with false claims, like your buddy algore...

Climategate: Gore falsifies the record

Andrew Bolt


Al Gore has studied the Climategate emails with his typically rigorous eye and dismissed them as mere piffle:

Q: How damaging to your argument was the disclosure of e-mails from the Climate Research Unit at East Anglia University?

AG: To paraphrase Shakespeare, it’s sound and fury signifying nothing. I haven’t read all the e-mails, but the most recent one is more than 10 years old. These private exchanges between these scientists do not in any way cause any question about the scientific consensus.

And in case you think that was a mere slip of the tongue:

Q: There is a sense in these e-mails, though, that data was hidden and hoarded, which is the opposite of the case you make [in your book] about having an open and fair debate.

AG: I think it’s been taken wildly out of context. The discussion you’re referring to was about two papers that two of these scientists felt shouldn’t be accepted as part of the IPCC report. Both of them, in fact, were included, referenced, and discussed. So an e-mail exchange more than 10 years ago including somebody’s opinion that a particular study isn’t any good is one thing, but the fact that the study ended up being included and discussed anyway is a more powerful comment on what the result of the scientific process really is.

In fact, thrice denied:

AG: These people are examining what they can or should do to deal with the P.R. dimensions of this, but where the scientific consensus is concerned, it’s completely unchanged. What we’re seeing is a set of changes worldwide that just make this discussion over 10-year-old e-mails kind of silly.

In fact, as Watts Up With That shows, one Climategate email was from just two months ago. The most recent was sent on November 12 - just a month ago. The emails which have Tom Wigley seeming (to me) to choke on the deceit are all from this year. Phil Jones’ infamous email urging other Climategate scientists to delete emails is from last year.

How closely did Gore read these emails? Did he actually read any at all? Was he lying or just terribly mistaken? What else has he got wrong?
 
The day you provide proof for your false claims, will be a cold day in hell...

You don't have proof, and you know it...

You are defending a bird of a feather...predictable...

Quote from Mom0/pH0x:

well if he's made false claims that certainly isn't one of them... our pedophile OP seems to be perfectly fine with cultural bigotry, so long as it's against southerners or jews. but not if it's against blacks or muslims... drunken pedophile troll is hardly a stranger to double standards :D

now watch him explode into another drunken fit where it stammers some irrelevant shit about a and b and c and continues to receive the humiliation it craves...

very well... carry on...
 
More of your self induced imaginations...

...more lies and inuendo, lacking any proof.

At least you are consistent like so many others around here in your false claims...

Repeat something false enough times, and the dimwitted actually believe it...

Did you learn that from Goebbels?



Quote from Mom0/pH0x:

LOL what's this? drunken pedophile troll making character attacks because it's been beaten with logical rebuttals??? NOOO even pedo-troll is above this... right???
 
Quote from OPTIONAL777:

...Repeat something false enough times, and the dimwitted actually believe it...

Did you learn that from Goebbels?
I can't speak for Mom0/pH0x, but I learned that tactic from that Z10 asshole.

You remember him, don't ya?
LOL

:D
 
So you "learned" something that you think is "right" and then practice it?

Too absurd...

A simple thank you would be more appropriate...

Quote from Lucrum:

I can't speak for Mom0/pH0x, but I learned that tactic from that Z10 asshole.

You remember him, don't ya?
LOL

:D
 
Oh you are welcome.

Hopefully you will now learn to be logical...

...any idiot can be trained to act like a monkey, you have that down to a T.

Now see if you can learn to reason to conclusion rather from conclusion...

Quote from Lucrum:

OK, thank you Z10/optional777.
 
Quote from OPTIONAL777:

...any idiot can be trained to act like a monkey...
Or watch a monkey fuck a football, like you admitted to earlier?

Now see if you can learn to reason to conclusion rather from conclusion...
Quote from OPTIONAL777:
Repeat something false enough times, and the dimwitted actually believe it...
Since I learned to repeat something false enough times, the dimwitted actually believe it, from you.

Where am I supposed to learn "to reason to conclusion" from, cause it's certainly not you.


:confused:
 
Back
Top