Another reason why ron paul is an idiot

There is nothing between Americans and tyranny except the Bill of Rights...

My galpal is getting trampled by an unelected County Government official. We've been lied to, bullied, defrauded, etc.. the woman lied in court even... We can't do a thing about her via elections other than not vote for the party that agrees with her philosophically and she's in the Union... We have to sue everybody involved just to get a say in the whole mess, it's bullshit...
 
Correct me if I am wrong.

ron paul wants to bring all the troops home and only engage in wars if the US is attacked and if the US is attacked he says "we could wipe them off he face of the planet in seconds".

So, based on his foreign policy if say N. Korea or Iran hit Warsaw, Frankfurt, Paris, London and Montreal with a nuclear bomb ron paul would do nothing and just sit and wait until the us was attacked correct? he would sit back and wait for NY to be blown up and retaliate with more nuclear bombs correct resulting in nothing but a nuclear holocaust.

The example is extreme but let's just say Iran marched all over the middle east took control of a large percentage of the world's oil and shut the US off then what?

What if iran blew up every US embassy across the middle east and europe? We have no more allies and we have no more help because of his sound policy.

ron paul's foreign policy sounds nice and makes you feel good inside but is infantile at best.

His idiotic plans wouldn't even work in a game of stratego.




Quote from AK Forty Seven:

War after war,spending nearly as much on defense yearly as all other countries combined,our brave soldiers coming home in boxes and with their limbs blown off is better in your opinion :confused:
More...
 
Quote from John_Wensink:

Correct me if I am wrong.

ron paul wants to bring all the troops home and only engage in wars if the US is attacked and if the US is attacked he says "we could wipe them off he face of the planet in seconds".

So, based on his foreign policy if say N. Korea or Iran hit Warsaw, Frankfurt, Paris, London and Montreal with a nuclear bomb ron paul would do nothing and just sit and wait until the us was attacked correct? he would sit back and wait for NY to be blown up and retaliate with more nuclear bombs correct resulting in nothing but a nuclear holocaust.

The example is extreme but let's just say Iran marched all over the middle east took control of a large percentage of the world's oil and shut the US off then what?

What if iran blew up every US embassy across the middle east and europe? We have no more allies and we have no more help because of his sound policy.

ron paul's foreign policy sounds nice and makes you feel good inside but is infantile at best.

His idiotic plans wouldn't even work in a game of stratego.
More...

You are an idiot.
He would honor our treaties with allies .
Find something else to bitch about. We kept Russians in line without going to war with them, get it ?
 
Quote from John_Wensink:

This ad is so scummy it belongs in the democrat playbook.

Another reason why I would never vote for ron paul.

Reuters) - Republican presidential hopeful Jon Huntsman and members of his family expressed outrage on Friday at an advertisement targeted at his adopted daughters by a group supporting rival Ron Paul.

An online ad authored by "NHLiberty4Paul" shows footage of Huntsman with daughters Gracie, who was adopted from China, and Asha, adopted from India, when they were infants.

"American values. Or Chinese," the ad asks to a soundtrack of Chinese music. It calls Huntsman "the Manchurian Candidate" and ends with an image of Huntsman dressed as China's former communist leader Mao Zedong, and the words "Vote Ron Paul."
More...
Do you do any research or do you just swallow it whole?


Consulting Firm: Video Attributed to Paul Supporters Probably Created by Huntsman Operatives -


January 8, 2012

Ron Paul’s presidential campaign has hired a consulting firm to analyze the YouTube video critical of John Huntsman attributed to Paul’s supporters.

The analysis conducted by CanDo.com concludes that the video was posted by Huntsman supporters, not Ron Paul supporters. It was intended to provoke a backlash against Paul’s campaign.

Huntsman supporters in New Hampshire in October.

CanDo.com says it reached the conclusion because the YouTube account on which it was posted, NHLiberty4Paul, has no other videos and the video was posted on the same day the account was created. A Twitter account associated with the account was also created on the same day.

In addition, Huntsman’s campaign site, jon2012.com, linked to the video a day before it was picked up on Facebook, Gawker, RedState and before the establishment media attempted to denigrate Ron Paul’s supporters.

“After researching the available evidence, we believe it is likely that the video came from a source within or closely tied to the Huntsman Campaign,” CanDo.com concludes.

Here is CanDo.com’s summary:

Since no direct link to the video exists on Jon2012.com, how could YouTube show Jon2012.com as the referring site? Our best guess is that someone used a server on the Jon2012.com domain (such as webmail) to read an email that contained the link to the video. It is also likely that the first mobile views at that same time originated from links in emails. Clicking on a link from a webmail system on Jon2012.com would provide the needed headers for YouTube to record the link. …

Based on the evidence above and the coincidental timing of the release and subsequent events, it seems likely that a party close to the Huntsman campaign posted and distributed this video impersonating a Ron Paul supporter in order to cast Ron Paul and his campaign in a negative light.

http://www.infowars.com/consulting-...ters-probably-created-by-huntsman-operatives/
 
Hunstman is a at the end of the line in the race - there is not an once of logic for any Ron Paul supporters to even spend a minute on Huntsman - wake up and use some logec people - are you that brain dead?
 
Is Negative Huntsman Video Attributed to Paul Supporters a False Flag?

January 7, 2012


A YouTube video posing as a political ad is the latest effort to chip away at candidate Ron Paul’s rising popularity. The video shows candidate John Huntsman talking Chinese to his adopted daughter and questions his patriotism.

Huntsman was U.S. ambassador to China before entering the GOP race. He has trailed in the race behind Paul, Romney and Santorum.

Ron Paul responded to criticism by stating that he had nothing to do with the video. “I couldn’t even hear it, haven’t looked at it, but people do that, and they do it in all campaigns,” Paul said on Friday.

While the establishment media makes it appear the video is the work of dangerous Ron Paul supporters – invariably characterized as kooks, libertarian fanatics, or truthers – research by The End Run website reveals that the video may be a false flag possibly created by the Huntsman campaign itself:

The video was uploaded by a user called “NHLiberty4Paul” on Wednesday, January 4. A quick look at the user’s channel page (archived here as a backup) shows that the account was created the exactly same day that the video was uploaded. This brand new, anonymous user has, of course, zero other uploads.

Furthermore, according to the publicly-viewable stats provided by YouTube, the very first place this video was posted was Jon Huntsman’s campaign website, Jon2012.com. This was done on November 4, the very day the video was uploaded to YouTube, and before the video had received any traffic from other sites. (Emphasis in original.)


http://www.infowars.com/is-negative-huntsman-video-attributed-to-paul-supporters-a-false-flag/
 
research by The End Run website reveals that the video may be a false flag possibly created by the Huntsman campaign itself:

The video was uploaded by a user called “NHLiberty4Paul” on Wednesday, January 4. A quick look at the user’s channel page (archived here as a backup) shows that the account was created the exactly same day that the video was uploaded. This brand new, anonymous user has, of course, zero other uploads.

Furthermore, according to the publicly-viewable stats provided by YouTube, the very first place this video was posted was Jon Huntsman’s campaign website, Jon2012.com. This was done on November 4, the very day the video was uploaded to YouTube, and before the video had received any traffic from other sites. (Emphasis in original.)


Duh - so easy to figure these stupid anti-Ron Paul games out - of course the MSM never tells you all the details.
 
Quote from Hombre:

We kept Russians in line without going to war with them, get it ?
More...

+1

We not agree on a lot, who knows, right? But when it came to going to war, ruining our lives, travel wise, and all the other negatives in response to a few punks in airplanes, we may agree. We kept the Cold war, well, cold. We continue to fight a stupid 'drug war' who have much better armed, and more of them, combatants than alquaeda ever had, without invading nations.

Why do we have to get involved in every civil war in the world? I know, fight them there or fight them here, pretty lame IMO.

Get the oil, pay ourselves back with oil. How did that work out? Right.

We don't have to go to war with everyone. Keep our military strong enough to fight the real threats when and if they come. Cut back now, at least for a while. We can always rebuild quickly, always have.


c
 
Somebody is an idiot.

Foreign policy

Paul's views are generally attributed to those of non-interventionism, which is the belief that the United States should avoid entangling alliances with other nations, but still retain diplomacy, and avoid all wars not related to direct territorial self-defense.[citation needed] Paul is quoted as stating "America [should] not interfere militarily, financially, or covertly in the internal affairs of other nations"

To compare the Russians with the islamists and north koreans proves you are in the dark as much as mr paul.


Quote from Hombre:

You are an idiot.
He would honor our treaties with allies .
Find something else to bitch about. We kept Russians in line without going to war with them, get it ?
More...
 
Quote from John_Wensink:

Somebody is an idiot.

Foreign policy

Paul's views are generally attributed to those of non-interventionism, which is the belief that the United States should avoid entangling alliances with other nations, but still retain diplomacy, and avoid all wars not related to direct territorial self-defense.[citation needed] Paul is quoted as stating "America [should] not interfere militarily, financially, or covertly in the internal affairs of other nations"

To compare the Russians with the islamists and north koreans proves you are in the dark as much as mr paul.
More...

Again, YOU are an idiot. Stop talking!!!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top